Suame Interchange Project: Government Allocates Additional GH¢3 Billion for New Bypass

The Suame Interchange, a critical infrastructure project in Kumasi, Ghana, is undergoing a significant redesign that will require an additional GH¢3 billion in government funding. This decision, announced by the Minister for Roads and Highways, Governs Kwame Agbodza, centers on the construction of a new bypass and the elimination of the originally planned fourth-tier bridge. The minister attributed the cost increase and redesign to practical engineering considerations, unresolved legacy issues from the previous administration, and a strategic shift in regional traffic management under the current government’s “Big Push Programme”.

Key Points: Understanding the Suame Interchange Redesign

• Additional Cost: The government will spend an extra GH¢3 billion to construct a bypass as part of the redesigned Suame Interchange.
• Redesign Rationale: The fourth-tier bridge component is being removed due to updated traffic flow studies and the upcoming Kumasi Outer Ring Road.
• Legacy Challenges: Unresolved land acquisition (expropriation) and compensation issues from the prior NPP government made the original four-tier design financially and logistically unfeasible.
• Political Context: Minister Agbodza contrasted the project’s needs with the previous government’s spending on the National Cathedral, suggesting over $100 million could have partially funded the interchange.
• Projected Benefit: The modification aims to deliver a more efficient, context-sensitive road network for Kumasi and the Ashanti Region, reducing long-term delays.

Background: The Suame Interchange Project and Its Significance

Project Genesis and Original Scope

The Suame Interchange is a flagship road infrastructure project located in the Suame Municipality of Kumasi, the capital of Ghana’s Ashanti Region. Designed to alleviate chronic traffic congestion at one of the city’s busiest commercial corridors, the original plan featured a complex four-tier interchange. This ambitious design aimed to vertically separate traffic flows, theoretically allowing for seamless movement between major arterial roads.

The “Big Push Programme” and Kumasi Outer Ring Road

The current government’s broader infrastructure agenda, termed the “Big Push Programme”, includes the development of the Kumasi Outer Ring Road. This ring road is engineered to divert through-traffic—particularly heavy vehicles and traffic heading north or east—away from Kumasi’s congested city center. According to Minister Agbodza, this strategic complementary project fundamentally alters the traffic demand projections for the Suame Interchange itself.

Analysis: Dissecting the Reasons for Redesign and Cost Increase

1. Traffic Engineering and the Kumasi Outer Ring Road Impact

The primary technical justification for the redesign is a revised traffic model. The minister stated that the construction of the Kumasi Outer Ring Road will successfully divert a significant volume of traffic, especially long-distance and north-bound flows, away from the city center. Consequently, the traffic load anticipated to pass through the Suame Interchange is lower than originally projected. Building a full four-tier interchange, with its enormous capacity and cost, is no longer justified by the forecasted demand. The new design, which removes the fourth tier, is presented as a pragmatic, fit-for-purpose solution that matches the revised traffic reality, thereby optimizing the use of public funds.

2. The Critical Issue of Land Acquisition and Compensation

Beyond traffic studies, the minister highlighted severe land-related bottlenecks inherited from the previous administration. The original four-tier design’s footprint would have directly impacted multiple commercial properties, the Suame Police Station, and portions of the Garden City Mall land. Minister Agbodza claimed that the projected costs for land acquisition, compensation, and relocation for these critical facilities would have consumed “half of the original construction budget.” This, combined with protracted legal and administrative disputes over compensation (expropriation), rendered the original scope financially unsustainable and logistically stalled. The redesigned bypass route is framed as a solution that minimizes these disruptive and costly land acquisitions.

3. Political Rhetoric and the National Cathedral Comparison

The announcement was laced with political messaging. Minister Agbodza directly responded to criticisms from his predecessor, Francis Asenso-Boakye (who served under the previous NPP administration). He pointed to the previous government’s expenditure of “over $100 million” on the National Cathedral project as a matter of misplaced priorities. His implication is that a fraction of those funds could have completed a substantial part of the Suame Interchange, benefiting the Ashanti Region’s economy and commuters. This comparison serves a dual purpose: defending the current administration’s decision to seek additional funds for the bypass and critiquing the prior government’s infrastructure spending choices. It positions the current redesign not as a failure, but as a fiscally responsible correction forced by the predecessor’s incomplete groundwork.

4. Financial Implications: The GH¢3bn Figure

The stated additional GH¢3 billion is a significant sum that requires parliamentary approval and budgetary reallocation. While the minister did not provide a detailed cost-benefit analysis, the justification rests on two pillars: 1) The new bypass infrastructure itself represents new construction work, and 2) resolving the legacy land compensation logjam will require settling outstanding claims, which were not fully budgeted for in the original project cost. The total project cost has therefore escalated from its initial baseline.

Practical Advice for Stakeholders and the Public

For Commuters and Businesses in Kumasi

Residents and businesses in the Suame corridor and greater Kumasi should anticipate continued construction-related disruptions for the duration of the modified project. However, the minister’s prognosis is that the redesigned interchange, integrated with the Outer Ring Road, will yield a more efficient long-term traffic solution. Businesses, particularly those in the Suame commercial hub, should engage with project authorities to understand the final alignment of the bypass and its potential impact on access and operations. Community leaders may wish to monitor the land compensation process to ensure fairness and timeliness for affected parties.

For Policy Watchers and Civil Society

This case underscores the high cost of incomplete project preparation, especially regarding land acquisition. Advocacy groups should track the disbursement of the additional GH¢3 billion to ensure transparency and value for money. The political debate highlights the need for depoliticizing major infrastructure projects, ensuring continuity in planning and execution across government terms. The integration of the interchange with the larger Kumasi Outer Ring Road network is a positive example of systemic transport planning, which should be evaluated for its long-term effectiveness upon completion.

For Media and Information Disseminators

When reporting on this development, it is crucial to distinguish between the stated technical reasons (traffic studies, land issues) and the political framing. Verify claims about specific monetary figures (the $100m Cathedral spend, the GH¢3bn bypass cost) from official budget documents or parliamentary records where possible. Present the perspectives of all sides: the current minister’s justification, the former minister’s likely criticisms, and the views of independent urban planning or civil engineering experts on the merits of the redesign.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

What is the Suame Interchange?

It is a major road interchange project in Kumasi, Ghana, intended to reduce severe traffic congestion at a key commercial intersection in the Suame area.

Why is the government spending an extra GH¢3 billion?

The additional funds are for constructing a new bypass route and resolving costly land acquisition and compensation problems left unresolved by the previous administration, which made the original four-tier design impractical.

Why was the four-tier bridge removed from the plan?

Two main reasons: 1) The upcoming Kumasi Outer Ring Road will divert enough traffic that a four-tier interchange is no longer necessary, and 2) the original design would have required prohibitively expensive compensation for impacted properties like the Suame Police Station and Garden City Mall.

How does the National Cathedral relate to this?

Minister Agbodza used the previous government’s spending on the National Cathedral (over $100 million) as a comparative example, suggesting those funds could have been better used to partially complete the Suame Interchange. This is a political critique about spending priorities.

What is the “Big Push Programme”?

It is the current government’s overarching infrastructure development agenda, which includes major road projects like the Kumasi Outer Ring Road that influences the redesign of the Suame Interchange.

Will this redesign delay the project further?

While any redesign inherently causes some delay, the minister argues the new plan is more realistic and will prevent the far longer delays that would have occurred trying to implement the original, land-entangled four-tier design.

Conclusion: A Pragmatic Pivot or Political Football?

The decision to redesign the Suame Interchange and allocate an additional GH¢3 billion for a bypass represents a pivotal moment for this key Kumasi infrastructure project. The official rationale—a confluence of updated traffic engineering data from the Outer Ring Road and the resolution of intractable land legacy issues—presents a coherent, if costly, case for course correction. It highlights the critical importance of thorough feasibility studies, especially land audits, before finalizing major infrastructure designs.

However, the announcement cannot be divorced from its political context. The direct attribution of blame to the previous administration and the invocation of the National Cathedral spending reveal deep partisan divisions over national development priorities. The true measure of this decision will be in its execution: the transparent use of the new funds, the fair settlement of all compensation claims, and the eventual delivery of a safe, efficient interchange that genuinely eases congestion for the people of the Ashanti Region. The project’s success or failure will become a key data point in the ongoing debate about infrastructure governance in Ghana.

Sources and Attribution

This article is based on statements made by the Minister for Roads and Highways, Governs Kwame Agbodza, as reported by Life Pulse Daily in its article titled “Suame Interchange: Government spending additional GH¢3bn to construct bypass – Agbodza,” published on February 9, 2026. All direct quotations and project-specific details (e.g., the fourth-tier removal, references to the Suame Police Station, Garden City Mall, Kumasi Outer Ring Road, and the Big Push Programme) are attributed to the minister’s remarks as conveyed in that original report. The political comparison regarding National Cathedral spending is also directly sourced from the minister’s comments in the same piece.

Disclaimer: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made through Readers and Contributors in this platform don’t essentially constitute the perspectives or coverage of Multimedia Group Limited.