‘CAF may postpone 2027 AFCON’

Introduction

In a significant development for African football, credible reports indicate that the Confederation of African Football (CAF) is considering postponing the 2027 Africa Cup of Nations (AFCON). This potential delay, which would push the tournament to 2028, stems from serious concerns about the readiness of the East African co-hosting nations—Kenya, Tanzania, and Uganda—to stage the continent’s premier men’s football event. The situation raises critical questions about infrastructure, tournament scheduling, and CAF’s long-term strategic vision for its competitions. This article provides a comprehensive, verifiable breakdown of the situation, its background, potential consequences, and what it means for fans, hosts, and the future of the sport in Africa.

Key Points

Background

The 2027 AFCON Bid and CAF’s New Calendar

In December 2023, CAF President Patrice Motsepe officially confirmed that Kenya, Tanzania, and Uganda won the bid to host the 2027 Africa Cup of Nations. This was framed as a landmark moment for East African football. Simultaneously, he announced a major structural change: starting in 2028, AFCON would be held every four years instead of every two. The stated rationale was to align with the global football calendar, reduce player fatigue, and increase the tournament’s prestige and commercial value.

Under this new model, the 2027 tournament (awarded to East Africa) would be the last biennial edition. The 2029 edition, originally slated for a yet-to-be-determined host, was moved forward to 2028. This created a complex hosting calendar: the 2027 edition in East Africa, followed by a 2028 edition (for which Ethiopia and a Southern Africa bid had shown interest), and then the first quadrennial AFCON in 2029.

Historical Context: AFCON Frequency and Hosting Challenges

AFCON has a history of scheduling volatility. It was switched to odd years in 2013 to avoid clashing with the FIFA World Cup, and its biennial rhythm has often strained resources and calendars. Hosting the tournament requires not just stadiums but also extensive infrastructure: transportation networks, hotel accommodations, security apparatus, and broadcasting facilities. CAF’s evaluation criteria are stringent, and many African nations have struggled to meet them without significant investment and long-term planning.

The East African tri-nation bid was seen as a bold, developmental move by CAF to spread the tournament’s footprint and incentivize infrastructure development in a region with passionate football support but historically less hosting experience at this scale. However, the logistical complexity of coordinating across three countries, each with its own government and football federation, added a layer of difficulty absent in single-nation hosting.

Analysis

Infrastructure Doubts: The Core of the Postponement Talk

The reported “major concerns” from sources within the CAF executive committee are not abstract. They point to tangible gaps. Hosting a 24-team AFCON requires a minimum of 6-8 stadiums meeting CAF and FIFA Category 3 standards, along with training facilities, major airport upgrades, road networks connecting host cities, and thousands of hotel rooms.

Kenya: While Nairobi has modern stadiums like the Moi International Sports Centre, other proposed venues (e.g., in Kisumu, Machakos) require significant upgrades. Ongoing political and economic issues have delayed public works projects.

Tanzania: Dar es Salaam’s Benjamin Mkapa Stadium is a world-class venue, but other cities like Arusha, Mwanza, and Songea need substantial development. The sheer geographical spread of the three nations makes fan travel and team logistics exceptionally challenging.

Uganda: The Mandela National Stadium in Kampala is a key asset, but other potential venues like in Arua or Gulu are underdeveloped. Cross-border travel between the three countries, while theoretically facilitated by the East African Community, can be bureaucratically cumbersome for fans and media.

The caution is amplified by the recent 2024 CHAN tournament, co-hosted by Algeria, Ivory Coast, and Morocco but originally awarded to these same three East African nations. Kenya, Tanzania, and Uganda had to relinquish hosting rights due to delays in preparations. Their subsequent role as participants, not hosts, in the eventual CHAN held in early 2024, was marked by reported organizational hiccups with ticketing and security, which did not go unnoticed by CAF’s executive.

Scheduling and Calendar Conundrum

The international football calendar is a zero-sum game. The potential 2027 AFCON postponement is tangled with two other major calendar pressures:

1. The 2026 FIFA World Cup: A record 10 African teams are likely to qualify. Their focus and resources in 2025-2026 will be entirely on World Cup qualifiers and preparation. Scheduling AFCON qualifiers for a 2027 tournament in the same window creates a direct conflict, potentially weakening the quality of both competitions.
2. The New Quadrennial Cycle: CAF’s desire to move to a four-year AFCON cycle from 2028 is meant to solve this, but the transition is messy. The 2027 edition is the last of the old biennial system. Postponing it to 2028 would mean two “2028” tournaments: the rescheduled 2027 AFCON and the first quadrennial AFCON in 2029 (which would logically be called 2029, not 2028). This creates branding and planning confusion.

Furthermore, finding a viable window for qualifiers for a delayed 2027 tournament would be extremely difficult given the packed 2025-2026 schedule focused on the World Cup.

CAF’s Strategic Pivot: The African Nations League (ANL)

This potential crisis is a catalyst for CAF’s broader strategic shift. The long-term plan, championed by President Motsepe, is to launch the African Nations League (ANL) in 2029. This competition is designed to replace the biennial cycle of AFCON and the African Nations Championship (CHAN) as CAF’s primary commercial and competitive product.

The logic is to create a consistent, high-value tournament with guaranteed participation from top nations (based on ranking) that can secure long-term broadcasting and sponsorship deals. Scrapping the 2028 AFCON (by pushing 2027 to 2028) clears the calendar for the ANL’s launch in 2029. This explains the resistance from some quarters to simply finding a way to make 2027 work in East Africa; the postponement aligns with a pre-existing strategic pivot, using the East African infrastructure concerns as a justifying factor.

Conflicting Narratives: Motsepe’s Assurance vs. Committee Sources

CAF President Patrice Motsepe has publicly and repeatedly insisted that the 2027 AFCON will proceed in East Africa as planned. His statement, “I have a duty to develop football all over Africa… I’m confident that the Afcon in Tanzania, Kenya and Uganda will be enormously successful,” reflects a political and developmental imperative. Awarding the tournament to East Africa was a promise to expand football’s footprint.

However, the reports from “sources within the CAF executive committee” indicate a deep, operational skepticism at the governance level. This disconnect suggests either: a) the President is publicly maintaining a facade of confidence while private discussions consider alternatives, or b) a significant faction within CAF’s leadership is pushing back against the President’s developmental agenda in favor of ensuring tournament quality and financial stability. The upcoming executive committee meeting is the arena where this tension will play out.

Practical Advice

For the Host Nations (Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda)

• Urgent Infrastructure Audit: Commission an independent, CAF-recognized audit of all proposed venues and supporting infrastructure (transport, hotels, security). Present a transparent, realistic roadmap with firm deadlines.
• Unified Command Structure: Establish a single, powerful tri-nation organizing committee with direct authority over all host cities and cross-border logistics to overcome coordination challenges.
• Contingency Planning: Develop clear “Plan B” scenarios, such as reducing the number of host cities or utilizing stadiums in neighboring countries (e.g., Rwanda, South Sudan) if specific venues are not ready.
• Leverage CHAN Experience: Conduct a forensic review of what went wrong with CHAN 2024 preparations and security/ticketing operations to avoid repeat failures.

For CAF

• Transparent Communication: Avoid ambiguity. A clear decision—whether to proceed, postpone with conditions, or relocate—must be communicated swiftly to manage stakeholder expectations (fans, sponsors, federations).
• Legal Review: If postponement occurs, review the host nation contract. Most hosting agreements include clauses for termination or postponement due to “force majeure” or failure to meet benchmarks. A diplomatic solution, perhaps involving future hosting incentives for East Africa, may be needed.
• Calendar Integrity: The final decision must not create a unsustainable precedent that invites constant renegotiation from future hosts. Clear, enforceable criteria for hosting readiness must be established and applied uniformly.

For Fans, Sponsors, and Media

• Monitor Official Channels: Rely only on official CAF communications for confirmation. Speculation will be high until a formal decision is made post-Dar es Salaam meeting.
• Travel & Hospitality: If you have made plans or bookings for the 2027 tournament, consider flexible, refundable options until the fate of the tournament is definitively settled.
• Sponsors: Activate force majeure or adjustment clauses in sponsorship agreements. The value proposition of a delayed or relocated tournament will differ significantly from the original bid.

FAQ