Trump’s Board of Peace contributors pledge $7bn in Gaza reduction – Life Pulse Daily
Editor-in-chiefFebruary 20, 20263 Mins read14
Trump’s Board of Peace: $7 Billion Pledged for Gaza Reconstruction
Introduction
In a significant development for Middle East peace efforts, former U.S. President Donald Trump has announced that contributors to his newly formed Board of Peace have pledged more than $7 billion toward Gaza reconstruction. This announcement came during the inaugural meeting of the Board of Peace, an organization that has faced controversy due to concerns about potentially replacing United Nations involvement in the region.
Key Points
- Multiple nations have pledged over $7 billion for Gaza reconstruction efforts
- The Board of Peace includes countries like Kazakhstan, UAE, Morocco, and Saudi Arabia
- The initiative is part of a broader U.S.-brokered ceasefire agreement
- Concerns exist about Hamas disarmament and the viability of reconstruction without security guarantees
- Several Western allies, including the UK and Germany, have declined participation
Background
The conflict in Gaza stems from the Hamas-led attack on southern Israel on October 7, 2023, which resulted in approximately 1,200 deaths and 251 hostages taken. Israel’s military response led to over 72,000 Palestinian casualties, according to Gaza’s Hamas-run health ministry. The enclave’s infrastructure has been devastated, with the UN estimating damage costs at $70 billion.
The Board of Peace was established as part of a second phase of a U.S.-brokered ceasefire agreement that includes Hamas disarmament and Gaza reconstruction. However, the organization has faced skepticism from traditional U.S. allies who fear it may sideline the United Nations.
Analysis
The $7 billion pledge represents a significant financial commitment to Gaza’s reconstruction, but the initiative faces several critical challenges. First, there is little evidence that Hamas is prepared to disarm, despite Trump’s optimistic statements. Gazans report that Hamas is extending its control over the Strip, suggesting the group has no immediate plans to relinquish power.
Second, the security framework remains unclear. The plan calls for a newly trained and vetted Palestinian police force, assisted by an International Stabilisation Force (ISF) working with Israel and Egypt. However, both Israel and the U.S. have insisted that this force cannot be drawn from the existing Hamas-controlled police or simply composed of Palestinian Authority security forces from the West Bank.
Nickolay Mladenov, appointed as the Board’s high representative for Gaza, has stated that the Palestinian police force should be the main security agency in Gaza, assisted by the ISF, not vice versa. This approach aims to establish legitimate Palestinian governance while ensuring security, but implementing such a structure presents significant logistical and political challenges.
Practical Advice
For stakeholders interested in the peace process and reconstruction efforts:
1. **Monitor Security Developments**: The success of reconstruction depends entirely on establishing a secure environment. Watch for concrete steps toward Hamas disarmament and the formation of the new security force.
2. **Track International Participation**: The absence of key Western allies from the Board of Peace could affect the initiative’s legitimacy and effectiveness. Monitor whether additional countries join or if the composition changes.
3. **Assess Humanitarian Progress**: Beyond security, focus on immediate humanitarian needs. The UN’s $2 billion contribution for humanitarian assistance will be crucial for addressing urgent needs.
4. **Evaluate Governance Structures**: The establishment of legitimate Palestinian governance structures will be essential for long-term stability. Watch for progress in forming transitional authorities and administrative bodies.
FAQ
**Q: What is the Board of Peace and who created it?**
A: The Board of Peace is an organization established to coordinate reconstruction efforts in Gaza as part of a U.S.-brokered ceasefire agreement. It was announced by Donald Trump during his presidency.
**Q: Which countries have pledged money to the reconstruction effort?**
A: Countries that have pledged contributions include Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan, UAE, Morocco, Bahrain, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Uzbekistan, and Kuwait, totaling over $7 billion.
**Q: Why have some countries refused to join the Board of Peace?**
A: Several Western allies, including the UK, Canada, France, and Germany, have declined participation due to concerns that the organization might replace or sideline the United Nations in peace efforts.
**Q: What are the main obstacles to reconstruction?**
A: The primary obstacles include Hamas’s reluctance to disarm, the need to establish a legitimate security force, and the requirement for Israeli withdrawal from Gaza before reconstruction can begin.
**Q: How does this initiative differ from previous peace efforts?**
A: This initiative represents a more business-oriented approach, with significant private investment and a focus on reconstruction as a pathway to peace, rather than traditional diplomatic negotiations.
Conclusion
The $7 billion pledge for Gaza reconstruction represents a significant financial commitment to rebuilding the devastated enclave, but the initiative faces substantial challenges. The success of the Board of Peace will depend on addressing security concerns, particularly Hamas disarmament, establishing legitimate governance structures, and gaining broader international support. Without these elements, reconstruction efforts may falter, and the cycle of conflict could continue. The coming months will be critical in determining whether this ambitious initiative can deliver meaningful change for the people of Gaza and contribute to lasting peace in the region.
Sources
– Official statements from the Board of Peace inaugural meeting
– UN reports on Gaza damage assessments
– Statements from Israeli and Palestinian officials
– Reports from international news organizations covering the conflict and peace efforts
– Analysis from Middle East policy experts and think tanks
*Note: This article is based on available information as of February 2026. The situation remains fluid, and developments may affect the accuracy of specific details over time.*
Leave a comment