Freedom isn’t sufficient, State should give protection to electorate — Inusah Fuseini on intercourse exploitation – Life Pulse Daily

Introduction

In a recent development that has sparked national debate, former Tamale Central Member of Parliament and legal expert Inusah Fuseini has issued a stark warning about the limitations of freedom in the absence of effective state protection. His comments come in the wake of a disturbing case involving sexual exploitation by a foreign national, which has exposed significant vulnerabilities in Ghana’s security and intelligence infrastructure. Fuseini’s analysis goes beyond the immediate incident, raising fundamental questions about the role of the state in protecting its citizens and the effectiveness of current security measures.

Key Points

Background

The recent case that prompted Fuseini’s comments involved a foreign national allegedly engaged in sexual exploitation activities within Ghana. This incident has revealed troubling gaps in the country’s security apparatus, particularly regarding the detection and prevention of harmful networks operating within national borders. The case has raised serious questions about how such activities could occur without earlier intervention from intelligence services, and what this means for the safety of Ghanaian citizens.

Ghana, like many democratic nations, prides itself on freedom and individual rights. However, Fuseini argues that this freedom must be balanced with robust state protection. The country’s security agencies receive substantial funding from the national budget, yet the recent incident suggests these resources may not be translating into effective prevention and protection measures.

Analysis

The Freedom-Protection Paradox

Fuseini’s central argument challenges the assumption that democratic freedom automatically ensures citizen safety. He contends that while Ghana is indeed a free and democratic nation, this freedom creates certain vulnerabilities that must be actively managed through state intervention. The balance between maintaining democratic freedoms and ensuring adequate protection represents a complex challenge for modern governance.

Intelligence Agency Effectiveness

The former MP’s critique of intelligence services focuses on their apparent reactive rather than proactive nature. He questions the fundamental purpose of these agencies if they only respond after harm has occurred, rather than preventing incidents before they happen. This raises important questions about the metrics used to evaluate intelligence effectiveness and the allocation of resources within security agencies.

National Security Implications

The involvement of foreign nationals in exploitation activities introduces international dimensions to what might otherwise be considered criminal matters. Fuseini emphasizes that such incidents transcend individual criminal acts and represent potential threats to national security. This perspective suggests a need for enhanced international cooperation and more sophisticated border control measures.

Victim Vulnerability and State Responsibility

Fuseini’s comments also address the complex issue of victim vulnerability. He argues that while personal responsibility matters, it’s essential to recognize the broader context of manipulation and exploitation. This nuanced view suggests that state protection should encompass not just law enforcement but also social support systems and victim assistance programs.

Practical Advice

For Citizens

Citizens should remain vigilant and report suspicious activities to authorities. Understanding personal vulnerabilities and seeking support when needed is crucial. Community awareness programs can help individuals recognize potential exploitation risks.

For Security Agencies

Intelligence services should prioritize preventive measures and develop more sophisticated detection methods for harmful networks. Regular assessment of current protocols and increased community engagement could improve effectiveness.

For Policy Makers

Legislative frameworks may need updating to address modern exploitation methods. Resource allocation should prioritize prevention over reaction, and international cooperation mechanisms should be strengthened.

For Civil Society

Organizations should focus on education and awareness programs while providing support services for potential victims. Collaboration with security agencies can enhance protection efforts.

FAQ

Conclusion

Inusah Fuseini’s analysis provides a crucial perspective on the relationship between freedom and security in modern Ghana. His comments highlight the need for a more proactive approach to citizen protection, particularly in an era where exploitation networks can operate across borders with increasing sophistication. The challenge for Ghana’s security apparatus is to maintain democratic freedoms while developing more effective preventive measures against exploitation and other security threats. This requires not just enhanced intelligence capabilities but also a broader societal commitment to protecting vulnerable individuals and preventing harmful networks from establishing themselves within national borders.

Sources

The information presented in this article is based on statements made by Inusah Fuseini during his appearance on Newsfile on PleasureNews, as reported by Life Pulse Daily on February 21, 2026. Additional context and analysis have been drawn from established principles of national security and democratic governance.