APC-USA Letter to US Congress Dismisses Christian Genocide Claims in Nigeria: Distorted Narratives Exposed

Published: November 6, 2025

Introduction

In a bold move amid rising international tensions, the All Progressives Congress USA chapter (APC-USA) has penned a letter to key US Congress leaders, firmly rejecting claims of a “Christian genocide” in Nigeria. Dated November 5, 2025, this correspondence directly addresses US President Donald Trump’s recent threat to deploy American military forces unless the alleged persecution ends. Labeling such narratives as “distorted,” APC-USA advocates for diplomatic engagement over intervention, highlighting the complexities of Nigeria’s security challenges.

This development comes as Nigeria faces scrutiny under its designation as a “Country of Particular Concern” (CPC) for religious freedom violations. For those searching for facts on Christian genocide claims in Nigeria, this letter provides critical context on farmer-herder conflicts, government responses, and the risks of misinformation ahead of Nigeria’s 2027 elections. Understanding these nuances is essential for grasping the true drivers of violence in Nigeria’s Middle Belt.

Analysis

The APC-USA letter represents a strategic pushback against what its authors describe as exaggerated portrayals of Nigeria’s security situation. Addressed to Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, and Senate Minority Leader John Thune, it underscores America’s role in promoting global religious freedom while cautioning against reactive policies.

Background on US-Nigeria Tensions

US involvement stems from longstanding concerns over religious violence in Nigeria, where the US Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) has repeatedly flagged the country. Trump’s CPC designation amplifies this, potentially paving the way for sanctions or other measures. However, APC-USA argues that such classifications may be swayed by partisan domestic politics in Nigeria, particularly as the 2027 general elections approach.

Core Arguments in the Letter

Signed by APC-USA Chairman Prof. Tai Balofin, the letter acknowledges tragic losses from violence but reframes them as rooted in farmer-herder conflicts in Nigeria. These clashes, prevalent in the Middle Belt, arise from competition over land and resources between predominantly Muslim Fulani herders and often Christian farming communities. Balofin emphasizes that these are not systematic religious persecutions but communal disputes exacerbated by climate change, population growth, and weak governance.

APC-USA praises President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s proactive measures. For instance, following the June 2025 Benue State massacre—where over 200 lives, mostly Christian, were lost—Tinubu visited the area, ordered the arrest of suspects, and directed their prosecution under anti-terrorism and murder statutes. This response exemplifies Nigeria’s commitment to justice, countering narratives of state indifference.

Implications for US Policy

By calling for diplomacy, APC-USA positions itself as a bridge between Nigerian realities and US policymakers. This approach aligns with historical US preferences for multilateral engagement in Africa, avoiding the pitfalls of unilateral military actions seen in past interventions like Somalia or Libya.

Summary

In summary, APC-USA’s letter to US Congress leaders dismisses “Christian genocide” allegations in Nigeria as distorted narratives driven by misinformation. It highlights farmer-herder clashes as the primary cause of violence, commends President Tinubu’s decisive actions post-Benue massacre, and urges diplomatic solutions over Trump’s threatened military deployment. This intervention seeks to prevent escalation based on incomplete information, especially with Nigeria’s 2027 elections looming.

Key Points

Practical Advice

For policymakers, journalists, and concerned citizens tracking Nigeria religious violence, here’s actionable guidance to navigate these issues effectively.

Engaging Diplomatically

Prioritize fact-based dialogues with Nigerian stakeholders. Support joint US-Nigeria task forces on farmer-herder mediation, drawing from successful models like Rwanda’s post-genocide reconciliation programs. Organizations like the USCIRF can host roundtables featuring voices from both herder and farmer communities.

Research and Verification

Cross-reference reports from neutral sources such as the International Crisis Group or Amnesty International. Use satellite imagery and on-ground data to distinguish communal clashes from organized persecution. Tools like Google Earth Engine help map conflict hotspots in Benue and Plateau States.

Community Support

US-based Nigerian diaspora groups can amplify APC-USA’s message through petitions to Congress, emphasizing economic partnerships over confrontation. Invest in education programs highlighting Nigeria’s anti-terrorism frameworks, like the Terrorism (Prevention) Act 2011 (amended 2012).

Points of Caution

Approaching Nigeria’s security challenges requires vigilance against oversimplification.

• Misinformation Risks: Social media amplifies unverified Christian genocide Nigeria claims, often ignoring herder casualties in the same conflicts.
• Politicization: Ahead of 2027 elections, opposition narratives may exaggerate issues for political gain, as noted by APC-USA.
• Military Overreach: Historical US interventions in Africa have led to instability; diplomacy preserves alliances.
• Contextual Nuance: Failing to address root causes like desertification worsens cycles of violence.

Comparison

Comparing APC-USA’s stance to past incidents reveals patterns in Nigeria’s violence discourse.

Farmer-Herder Conflicts vs. Boko Haram Insurgency

Unlike Boko Haram’s ideological jihad, which targeted Christians explicitly (e.g., Chibok abductions 2014), Middle Belt clashes are bidirectional. Data from the Council on Foreign Relations shows herders suffering losses too, with over 2,000 deaths annually from 2018-2023 in such disputes.

US Designations and Responses

Nigeria’s CPC status mirrors Sudan’s past listings, where US sanctions prompted reforms without invasion. Trump’s rhetoric echoes his 2019 tweets on Nigerian elections but stops short of action, unlike Iraq 2003.

Tinubu’s Record vs. Predecessors

Tinubu’s Benue visit surpasses Buhari-era responses criticized for inaction. Under Jonathan (2010-2015), similar massacres prompted international outcry but no military threats from the US.

Legal Implications

Legal aspects are central to APC-USA’s defense of Nigeria’s handling of violence.

President Tinubu’s directive for prosecutions under Nigeria’s Terrorism (Prevention) (Amendment) Act 2013 and the Criminal Code Act invokes robust frameworks. Suspects face charges carrying life imprisonment or death penalties, as seen in prior convictions like those of Boko Haram leaders. This judicial approach aligns with international standards under the UN Convention Against Transnational Organized Crime, bolstering Nigeria’s case against genocide labels, which require intent under the 1948 Genocide Convention—absent in communal clashes.

US legal hurdles for intervention include the War Powers Resolution (1973), requiring congressional approval for sustained military action. Thus, APC-USA’s diplomatic plea resonates with American checks and balances.

Conclusion

APC-USA’s letter to US Congress marks a pivotal moment in countering distorted narratives on Christian genocide in Nigeria. By reframing violence through the lens of farmer-herder conflicts and showcasing Tinubu’s accountability, it fosters a path for constructive US-Nigeria relations. As global powers weigh intervention, prioritizing verified facts and diplomacy will safeguard lives and stability. Stakeholders must heed this call to avoid escalating tensions ahead of 2027, ensuring Nigeria addresses its challenges on its terms.

FAQ