Zelensky Rejects US Peace Plan for Ukraine War: Vows No Betrayal Amid Trump’s 28-Point Proposal

Published: November 21, 2025

Introduction

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has firmly pushed back against a proposed US peace plan for the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict, emphasizing that he will not “betray” Ukraine. In a video address to the nation on November 21, 2025, Zelensky described the current situation as one of Ukraine’s “most difficult moments in history.” The plan, a 28-point proposal attributed to US President Donald Trump’s administration, includes terms that Kyiv views as favorable to Moscow, such as territorial concessions and restrictions on Ukraine’s military and NATO aspirations.

This development highlights escalating tensions in diplomatic efforts to end the war that began with Russia’s full-scale invasion in February 2022. Zelensky’s stance underscores Ukraine’s commitment to sovereignty amid pressure from a key ally, the United States. Keywords like “Zelensky US peace plan” and “Trump Ukraine proposal” are gaining traction as global observers analyze potential shifts in the Russia-Ukraine war dynamics.

Context of Zelensky’s Address

Broadcast on social media via his official Facebook page, Zelensky’s speech—delivered while dressed in black—warned of a tough choice between preserving dignity and risking the loss of Washington as a partner. He pledged to present counterarguments and “options” directly to Trump in upcoming talks.

Analysis

The US peace plan for the Ukraine-Russia conflict represents a bold diplomatic initiative but has sparked controversy due to its perceived bias toward Russian demands. Zelensky’s rejection signals a potential rift in US-Ukraine relations, even as he expresses respect for Trump’s intent to end the bloodshed.

Breaking Down the 28-Point Plan

According to reports viewed by AFP, the proposal requires Ukraine to recognize Moscow’s annexation of Crimea and occupied eastern regions as “de-facto” Russian territory. It also calls for freezing front lines in southern Kherson and Zaporizhzhia areas, withdrawal from parts of Donetsk still held by Kyiv, capping Ukraine’s military at 600,000 personnel, forgoing NATO membership permanently, and banning NATO troops on Ukrainian soil. In exchange, Ukraine would receive unspecified “reliable security guarantees” and a reconstruction fund from Russia’s frozen assets.

For Russia, the plan offers retention of seized territories, reintegration into the global financial system, and rejoining the G8. This structure aims for a ceasefire but prioritizes Moscow’s gains, prompting Kyiv and European allies to question its fairness.

Diplomatic Maneuvers

Zelensky recently held a nearly hour-long call with US Vice President JD Vance and US Army Secretary Dan Driscoll, followed by plans for direct talks with Trump. He also convened emergency discussions with leaders from Germany, France, and the UK, who reaffirmed “unwavering support” for a “just peace.” Europe’s exclusion from the plan formulation has heightened unease about a potential Trump-Putin axis influencing the Ukraine war outcome.

The Kremlin’s response, via spokesman Dmitry Peskov, urged Zelensky to “negotiate now” or risk further territorial losses, aligning with Moscow’s long-standing calls for his removal and snap elections within 100 days as stipulated in the plan.

Summary

In summary, Zelensky’s November 21, 2025, address rejects key elements of the Trump 28-point US peace plan for the Russia-Ukraine conflict, vowing not to betray national interests. Facing immense pressure, he plans to propose alternatives to Trump while rallying European support. The plan’s terms—territorial cessions, military limits, and NATO exclusions—contrast sharply with Ukraine’s demands for full territorial integrity and security guarantees, setting the stage for high-stakes negotiations.

Key Points

Practical Advice

For those following the Russia-Ukraine war and its geopolitical ramifications, staying informed requires reliable sources and critical analysis. Here’s practical guidance to navigate developments like the Zelensky US peace plan debate:

Monitoring Developments

Track official statements from Zelensky’s office, the White House, and the Kremlin via their verified social media and websites. Use tools like Google Alerts for keywords such as “Trump Ukraine peace plan” or “Zelensky Russia negotiations” to receive real-time updates.

Educating Yourself on Geopolitics

Understand historical context: Russia’s 2014 annexation of Crimea and the 2022 invasion violated international norms. Study NATO’s open-door policy and Ukraine’s constitutional amendments pursuing membership since 2019. Resources like the Council on Foreign Relations provide verifiable timelines.

Engaging Constructively

Discuss facts only—avoid misinformation on social media. Support Ukraine through verified humanitarian channels like the Red Cross, focusing on reconstruction needs highlighted in peace proposals.

Points of Caution

While the US peace plan offers a potential end to hostilities, several cautions arise in the Zelensky-Trump dynamic:

Risks of Concessions

Territorial cessions could set precedents for aggressors worldwide, undermining post-WWII borders. Military caps might leave Ukraine vulnerable post-ceasefire, as seen in past Minsk agreements’ failures.

Diplomatic Isolation

Zelensky warns of losing the US as a “key partner,” a real risk given America’s $60+ billion in aid since 2022. Europe’s support is vital but limited without US involvement.

Battlefield Realities

Moscow’s advances shrink Ukraine’s negotiating space, per Peskov. Freezing lines without enforcement mechanisms risks renewed fighting, as in 2014-2022 Donbas ceasefire violations.

Comparison

Comparing the Trump 28-point plan to prior proposals reveals stark differences in approach to the Russia-Ukraine conflict.

Versus Minsk Agreements (2014-2015)

Minsk I/II called for ceasefires, withdrawals, and elections in Donbas under Ukrainian law—never fully implemented. Trump’s plan goes further by legitimizing annexations, unlike Minsk’s autonomy focus.

Versus Zelensky’s 10-Point Plan (2022)

Zelensky’s G20 plan demands full Russian withdrawal, reparations, and war crimes trials. It rejects territorial compromises, prioritizing justice over the US plan’s pragmatism.

Versus Istanbul Talks (2022)

Early negotiations explored neutrality and Crimea delays; Trump’s proposal echoes neutrality but accelerates concessions, bypassing prolonged talks.

Legal Implications

The US peace plan raises verifiable legal questions under international law applicable to the Ukraine-Russia war.

UN Charter and Territorial Integrity

Article 2(4) prohibits force altering borders; UN General Assembly resolutions (e.g., ES-11/1, 2022) affirm Ukraine’s sovereignty, rejecting Crimea’s 2014 referendum as invalid due to occupation.

Budapest Memorandum (1994)

US, UK, Russia guaranteed Ukraine’s borders for denuclearization; concessions could imply abrogation, eroding non-proliferation trust.

NATO and Helsinki Accords

No treaty bans Ukraine’s NATO bid; forcing renunciation violates Helsinki Final Act’s free choice principle. Snap elections under duress question legitimacy per Venice Commission standards.

Implementation would require multilateral treaties, but unilateral recognitions risk ICC scrutiny for aiding aggression.

Conclusion

Zelensky’s resolute pushback against the US peace plan encapsulates Ukraine’s defiance in the Russia-Ukraine conflict. By vowing no betrayal and seeking direct dialogue with Trump, he balances diplomacy with principle. As negotiations loom, the plan’s fate hinges on balancing security, territory, and alliances. Stakeholders must prioritize verifiable facts for a sustainable resolution, ensuring lessons from this “most difficult moment” shape future global stability.

FAQ