Shein and Temu Under Investigation for Alleged US Design Theft

Introduction

Two of the world’s fastest‑growing online retailers—Shein and Temu—are now the focus of multiple U.S. investigations. Lawmakers and state officials have raised concerns about forced labor, the use of unsafe fabrics, and possible intellectual‑property (IP) theft involving American designers. This article explains the political context, the specific allegations, and the potential outcomes for the companies, their customers, and U.S. manufacturers.

Analysis

Political Drivers Behind the Probes

In recent months, two senior Republican officials have publicly called for action:

• Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton announced a state‑level investigation into Shein’s labor practices and product safety.
• Senator Tom Cotton (R‑AR) sent a letter to the U.S. Attorney General requesting a federal inquiry into possible IP theft by both Shein and Temu.

Both officials are known allies of former President Donald Trump and vocal critics of China’s trade practices. Their involvement signals a broader political agenda that blends consumer‑protection concerns with a strategic push to limit cheap Chinese imports.

Key Allegations

1. Forced labor and unsafe fabrics – Paxton’s probe will examine whether Shein’s supply chain relies on coerced workers and whether the company sells clothing that fails U.S. safety standards.
2. Intellectual‑property theft – Cotton alleges that Shein and Temu systematically copy designs from U.S. creators, offering near‑identical items at a fraction of the price.
3. Counterfeit products – A separate U.S. study found a “significant percentage” of items purchased from both platforms were likely counterfeit, raising questions about trademark infringement.
4. Content safety for minors – The European Union, and specifically France, has flagged Temu for hosting weapons‑themed toys and sexual‑content dolls that could be accessed by children.

Business Responses

Shein released a statement emphasizing cooperation with Paxton’s investigation and “positive engagement” with Texas officials. The company also highlighted its ongoing investment in “protecting the rights of designers worldwide” and claimed to be continuously improving internal processes to safeguard creators.

Temu, on the other hand, has not issued an official comment as of the time of writing. The silence may be strategic, allowing the company to assess the legal landscape before responding publicly.

Impact of Recent Trade Policy Changes

In August 2024, the U.S. altered the “de minimis” rule, which previously allowed low‑value shipments (under $800) to enter the country duty‑free. The new rule subjects many low‑cost items—like those sold by Shein and Temu—to tariffs and stricter customs scrutiny. Senator Cotton argues that this “golden opportunity” gives the Department of Justice and Homeland Security additional tools to enforce IP laws and protect American manufacturers.

Summary

The investigations into Shein and Temu are multi‑faceted:

• State‑level scrutiny in Texas focuses on labor conditions and product safety.
• Federal pressure, led by Senator Cotton, targets alleged IP theft and counterfeit sales.
• International regulators (EU, France) are also probing content safety and sales of prohibited items.

While both companies claim to be cooperating, the outcomes could reshape the fast‑fashion ecommerce landscape, affect pricing, and impose new compliance costs.

Key Points

Practical Advice for Consumers

How to Verify Product Authenticity

1. Check the seller’s brand verification badge on the platform.
2. Compare product photos with the original designer’s catalog; look for subtle differences in stitching, hardware, or labeling.
3. Read user reviews for mentions of “quality” or “counterfeit” warnings.
4. Use third‑party verification services (e.g., CheckYourBrand) before purchasing high‑value items.

Safety Tips for Clothing and Toys

• Inspect garment labels for flame‑retardant compliance (e.g., CPSIA markings for children’s wear).
• For toys, ensure they meet the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) standards for lead content and choking hazards.
• Consider purchasing from retailers that provide a clear return and refund policy in case the product fails safety tests.

What to Do If You Suspect Counterfeit Goods

Report the listing to the platform’s “Intellectual Property” or “Counterfeit” reporting tool. Additionally, you may file a complaint with the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) if you believe your rights have been infringed.

Points of Caution

While the investigations are ongoing, it is important to avoid speculation:

• Do not assume guilt before a formal finding—both companies maintain the presumption of innocence.
• Beware of “click‑bait” articles that conflate unrelated issues (e.g., Roblox lawsuits) with the Shein/Temu probes.
• Regulatory outcomes may vary by jurisdiction; a Texas decision does not automatically translate to a federal ruling.

Comparison: Shein vs. Temu

Legal Implications

Several statutes could be invoked depending on the investigation’s findings:

Forced‑Labor Violations

• Section 307 of the Tariff Act of 1930—prohibits importation of goods made with forced labor. Violations can lead to customs detention, seizure, and civil penalties up to $250,000 per violation.
• Modern‑Slavery Act (U.S.)—requires companies to disclose steps taken to prevent slavery in supply chains. Non‑compliance could trigger FTC enforcement actions.

Intellectual‑Property Theft

• Copyright Act (Title 17)—protects original designs; infringement can result in statutory damages ranging from $750 to $30,000 per work, and up to $150,000 for willful infringement.
• Trademark Act (Lanham Act)—covers counterfeit goods and false advertising. Remedies include injunctions, disgorgement of profits, and attorney fees.
• Economic Espionage Act (EEA)—if proven that trade secrets were stolen for commercial advantage, criminal penalties include up to 10 years imprisonment and fines.

Consumer‑Safety Regulations

• CPSIA (Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act)—mandates testing for lead, phthalates, and flame retardants in children’s apparel and toys. Failure can result in recalls and civil penalties.
• CPSC compliance—non‑conforming products can be ordered off the market, and companies may face up to $15,000 per violation.

Conclusion

The simultaneous investigations into Shein and Temu reflect a growing U.S. appetite for holding fast‑fashion and discount‑ecommerce platforms accountable for labor standards, product safety, and respect for American intellectual property. While both companies have pledged cooperation, the legal and regulatory stakes are high: potential tariffs, civil damages, and even criminal liability could reshape how these platforms source, price, and market their goods.

For consumers, the key takeaway is vigilance—verify authenticity, prioritize safety‑certified items, and stay informed about evolving regulations. For U.S. designers and small manufacturers, the probes may finally provide a pathway to protect their creations from being undercut by mass‑produced knock‑offs.

FAQ