We’re dedicated to two-term presidential prohibit — NDC – Life Pulse Daily

Introduction

Recent political discourse in Ghana has been dominated by a clear and unequivocal declaration from the National Democratic Congress (NDC): the party is dedicated to the two‑term presidential prohibit enshrined in the 1992 Constitution. The statement, signed by the party’s National Chairman, Johnson Asiedu Nketiah, reiterates a long‑standing commitment to uphold the constitutional limit that prevents any individual – including President John Dramani Mahama – from seeking a third term in office. This declaration is a response to emerging rumours and public comments suggesting that a constitutional amendment might be pursued to allow a third presidential term. Understanding the context, implications, and practical outcomes of this stance is essential for citizens, policymakers, and observers who follow Ghana’s democratic trajectory.

Key Points

Background

Historical Evolution of Term Limits in Ghana

Ghana’s presidential term‑limit framework has evolved through several key milestones:

1. 1992 Constitution: Introduced a two‑term limit for the first time, breaking the pattern of indefinite rule that characterised earlier regimes.
2. 1996 Amendment: Clarified that term limits applied to any individual who had previously served two terms, regardless of whether the terms were consecutive.
3. 2000 and 2012 Elections: Demonstrated the practical operation of the limit, as incumbents stepped down after completing two terms.
4. Public Debate (2023‑2025): A renewed discussion emerged, spurred by proposals from some legislators who argued that the limit could be revisited to accommodate “experienced leadership”.

Role of the NDC in Ghanaian Politics

The NDC, founded in 1992, has historically positioned itself as the defender of the constitutional order. During its periods in government (1996‑2000, 2009‑2012, 2013‑2017, and 2021‑present), the party has consistently cited the two‑term provision as a safeguard against authoritarian drift. The party’s current stance aligns with its broader narrative of protecting Ghana’s democratic institutions.

Recent Public Statements

On December 13, 2025, the NDC released a press statement signed by National Chairman Johnson Asiedu Nketiah. The statement explicitly:

• Denied any party‑wide intention to amend the presidential term‑limit clause.
• Emphasised that President John Dramani Mahama has repeatedly shown respect for the Constitution.
• Warned that any move to remove the limit would introduce “unnecessary pressure, invite instability, and undermine the peace Ghana has enjoyed under the Fourth Republic”.

Analysis

Constitutional Amendment Process in Ghana

Amending the Constitution requires a two‑thirds majority vote in Parliament and, subsequently, a national referendum. This high threshold makes unilateral changes difficult, especially when political parties are divided. As of the 2025 parliamentary composition, no single party holds the requisite super‑majority, meaning any amendment would need cross‑party consensus – a scenario that is currently unlikely given the NDC’s firm opposition.

Implications for Political Stability

By publicly reaffirming its dedication to the two‑term prohibit, the NDC seeks to prevent the kind of political volatility that has erupted in other African states where term‑limit revisions have sparked protests and, in some cases, civil unrest. The party’s stance serves as a stabilizing signal to investors, civil society, and the international community that Ghana’s democratic framework remains predictable.

Potential Impact on the 2026 Electoral Landscape

Although the next presidential election is scheduled for 2026, the conversation about term limits is likely to influence party manifestos and coalition negotiations. Parties that champion term‑limit preservation may gain traction among voters who value institutional continuity, while parties perceived as pushing for amendment could face backlash.

Legal and Governance Considerations

From a legal perspective, any amendment effort would need to respect the procedural safeguards embedded in the Constitution, including the requirement for a national referendum. Moreover, the Supreme Court of Ghana has previously upheld the integrity of the term‑limit clause, reinforcing its status as a non‑negotiable constitutional principle.

Practical Advice

For Citizens Engaged in Civic Dialogue

1. Verify Sources: Always check official party releases and parliamentary records before accepting claims about constitutional reforms.

2. Participate in Public Consultations: When government bodies invite feedback on proposed amendments, submit well‑researched comments that emphasise the importance of stability.

3. Support Independent Media: Rely on outlets that fact‑check statements and provide balanced analysis rather than sensationalist reporting.

For policymakers and legislators

1. Uphold Constitutional Norms: Any proposal to alter the presidential term‑limit must undergo rigorous constitutional review and public scrutiny.

2. Promote Transparency: Publish detailed impact assessments that explain how term‑limit changes could affect governance, economic policy, and national security.

3. Engage Stakeholders: Consult civil society organisations, legal experts, and academic institutions to ensure a broad-based understanding of the implications.

For Researchers and Analysts

1. Track Legislative Histories: Maintain a database of all bills related to constitutional amendment, noting sponsor, voting patterns, and public response.

2. Compare International Precedents: Examine how other African democracies have handled term‑limit debates to draw lessons relevant to Ghana’s context.

3. Publish Evidence‑Based Findings: Ensure that any analysis of the NDC’s stance is anchored in verifiable data and avoids speculative narratives.

FAQ

Conclusion

The National Democratic Congress has unequivocally declared its dedication to preserving Ghana’s two‑term presidential prohibit. This stance is rooted in a deep respect for the 1992 Constitution, a desire to maintain national stability, and a strategic political positioning that aligns with the party’s historical identity as a guardian of democratic norms. While public discussions about potential constitutional amendments may continue, the legal, procedural, and political barriers to removing the term‑limit are substantial. For citizens, policymakers, and analysts, the key takeaway is that any move to alter the two‑term provision would require broad consensus – a consensus that, as of now, does not exist. Maintaining vigilance, promoting informed dialogue, and upholding constitutional integrity will be crucial for safeguarding Ghana’s democratic future.