AFCON: Senegalese fanatics held in Morocco ‘fasting’, no longer on starvation strike, attorney says

Editor-in-chiefFebruary 7, 20264 Mins read20

AFCON: Senegalese fanatics held in Morocco ‘fasting’, no longer on starvation strike, attorney says

Introduction

Eighteen Senegalese soccer fans imprisoned in Morocco over alleged “hooliganism” during the Africa Cup of Nations (AFCON) final are reportedly engaging in a form of protest through selective fasting rather than a full hunger strike, according to their attorney. This development comes amid ongoing legal proceedings and heightened tensions following Senegal’s dramatic victory over Morocco in the tournament final.

Key Points

18 Senegalese fans detained in Morocco following AFCON final disturbances
Initially reported as hunger strike, now described as intermittent fasting
Detainees arrested on January 18, 2024, during Senegal vs. Morocco final
Senegal won the match 1-0 in Rabat
Legal proceedings ongoing with multiple court hearing postponements
Attorneys’ strike in Morocco has affected the judicial process

Background

The AFCON Final Incident

The Africa Cup of Nations final between Senegal and Morocco on January 18, 2024, was marked by significant tension both on and off the field. Senegal secured a narrow 1-0 victory, but the match was overshadowed by incidents involving supporters and players.

Arrests and Initial Detention

Following the match, Moroccan authorities arrested 18 Senegalese fans, accusing them of hooliganism. The arrests came after several incidents during the game, including attempts by some supporters to storm the pitch and objects being thrown onto the field, including a chair.

Early Reports of Hunger Strike

Initial reports suggested the detainees had begun a hunger strike to protest their pre-trial detention and demand to be heard by Moroccan authorities. Their attorney, Patrick Kabou, had stated that the fans wrote to him claiming they would “continuously fast until Moroccan justice gives us the chance to be heard.”

Analysis

Clarification of Fasting vs. Hunger Strike

The distinction between a hunger strike and intermittent fasting is significant in this context. While a hunger strike typically involves complete abstention from food for an extended period as a form of protest, intermittent fasting suggests a more controlled approach to food consumption. This clarification may have legal and health implications for the detainees and could affect how their protest is perceived by authorities and the public.

Legal Proceedings and Challenges

The case has faced several delays, with court hearings being postponed multiple times. The first hearing in late January was adjourned at the request of the fans’ attorneys, and a second hearing on Thursday was postponed due to an ongoing attorneys’ strike in Morocco. These delays highlight the complexities of the legal process and the potential impact of broader systemic issues on individual cases.

International Relations and Sports Diplomacy

This incident occurs against the backdrop of the close relationship between Senegal and Morocco in African football. Both nations are considered powerhouses in African soccer, and incidents like these can strain diplomatic relations and affect future sporting events. The handling of this case by Moroccan authorities will likely be scrutinized by both Senegalese officials and international sports organizations.

Practical Advice

For Concerned Family Members and Supporters

If you are a family member or supporter of one of the detained fans, it’s crucial to stay informed about the legal proceedings and maintain communication with the legal team. Consider reaching out to Senegalese diplomatic missions in Morocco for assistance and support. It’s also advisable to document all communications and developments related to the case.

For Legal Observers and Human Rights Organizations

Organizations monitoring this case should focus on ensuring that the detainees’ rights are respected throughout the legal process. This includes verifying that they have access to legal representation, proper medical care, and are being held in humane conditions. Documenting any changes in their treatment or the progress of legal proceedings can be valuable for advocacy efforts.

For Sports Organizations and Event Planners

This incident underscores the importance of robust security measures and crowd control at major sporting events. Future tournament organizers should review and potentially enhance their protocols for managing high-tension matches and preventing incidents that could lead to legal complications or diplomatic tensions.

FAQ

What exactly happened during the AFCON final that led to these arrests?

During the final match between Senegal and Morocco, some Senegalese supporters attempted to storm the pitch, and objects including a chair were thrown onto the field. These actions were deemed as hooliganism by Moroccan authorities, leading to the arrest of 18 fans.

Why did the attorney initially report a hunger strike, then clarify it as fasting?

The initial report of a hunger strike may have been based on limited information from the detainees. The clarification to intermittent fasting suggests a more nuanced understanding of the detainees’ actions, possibly to avoid the more severe implications of a full hunger strike.

How long can these fans be held without formal charges?

The specific legal framework for pre-trial detention in Morocco would determine the maximum duration. However, international human rights standards generally limit pre-trial detention to prevent arbitrary imprisonment. The exact timeline would depend on Moroccan law and the specific circumstances of the case.

What are the potential consequences for the detained fans?

Depending on the charges and the outcome of the trial, the fans could face various penalties ranging from fines to imprisonment. The severity would depend on the specific laws violated and the judge’s discretion.

How might this incident affect future Senegal-Morocco football relations?

While it’s difficult to predict long-term impacts, such incidents can strain diplomatic relations between countries. Both football associations and governments may need to engage in dialogue to address the underlying issues and prevent similar occurrences in future matches.

Conclusion

The case of the 18 Senegalese fans detained in Morocco following the AFCON final highlights the complex intersection of sports, law, and international relations. As the legal proceedings continue, it’s crucial to monitor the situation closely, ensuring that the rights of the detainees are respected and that justice is served fairly. This incident serves as a reminder of the intense passions that football can evoke and the importance of maintaining order and respect in sporting events. The outcome of this case may have implications not only for the individuals involved but also for future sporting events and diplomatic relations between Senegal and Morocco.

Sources

Vanguard News. (2024, February 7). AFCON: Senegalese fans held in Morocco ‘fasting’, not on hunger strike, lawyer says. Retrieved from www.vanguardngr.com
Various news reports on the Africa Cup of Nations final and subsequent arrests
Information on Moroccan legal procedures and human rights standards