AFCON to Expand to 28 Teams: CAF’s Major Tournament Restructure Explained

Introduction: A New Era for African Football

The Confederation of African Football (CAF) has announced a landmark restructuring of its flagship event, the Africa Cup of Nations (AFCON). In a decisive move aimed at broadening the tournament’s reach and impact, CAF President Dr. Patrice Motsepe confirmed that the competition will be expanded to include 28 national teams. Furthermore, the tournament will cement a new four-year cycle following the 2028 edition, moving away from its traditional biennial schedule. This transformative decision, revealed after a CAF Executive Committee meeting in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, signals a bold strategic shift for the continent’s most prestigious football championship. The expansion means that over half of CAF’s 54 member associations will now have the opportunity to compete at the final tournament, a significant increase from the current 24-team format. This article provides a comprehensive, SEO-optimized analysis of the announcement, detailing the key changes, historical context, potential impacts, and practical implications for stakeholders across the African football ecosystem.

Key Points: The Essential Announcements

The recent CAF communication outlines several concrete changes to the future of AFCON. The following points summarize the core takeaways from President Motsepe’s statement:

• Expansion to 28 Teams: The final tournament will grow from 24 to 28 participating national teams.
• New Four-Year Cycle: Starting after the 2028 AFCON, the tournament will be held every four years, aligning with other major global competitions like the FIFA World Cup and UEFA European Championship.
• No Fixed Timeline: While the decision is made, a specific implementation date for the 28-team format was not provided. The transition schedule remains under discussion.
• Format Details Pending: CAF has not yet revealed the precise tournament structure (e.g., group stage configuration, knockout round size) that will accommodate the additional four teams.
• Strategic Goal: The expansion is explicitly designed to enhance competitiveness and provide more African nations with the platform to compete at the highest continental level.
• 2027 Tournament Unaffected: The upcoming 2027 AFCON, to be co-hosted by Kenya, Tanzania, and Uganda, will proceed as a 24-team event as planned.
• Member Association Representation: With 54 CAF members, a 28-team finals represents participation for over 51% of the confederation’s national associations.

Background: The Evolution of the Africa Cup of Nations

To understand the magnitude of this change, it is crucial to examine the historical trajectory of AFCON’s format.

From 16 to 24: The Recent Past

For decades, the Africa Cup of Nations operated with a 16-team format. This changed in 2019 when CAF expanded the finals to 24 teams, a decision driven by a desire to increase revenue, global visibility, and participation. The 24-team era introduced a group stage with six groups of four, followed by a round of 16. This format has been used for the last four editions (Egypt 2019, Cameroon 2021, Ivory Coast 2023, and the upcoming Morocco 2025). The expansion was initially seen as a major success, boosting commercial value and allowing more nations to experience the final tournament’s economic and sporting benefits.

The Push for Further Growth

The move to 28 teams is the next logical step in this expansionist policy. It directly addresses a long-standing aspiration within CAF and many of its member associations to further democratize access to the continental showpiece. With 54 member countries, the 24-team format still excluded nearly 56% of members from the final tournament. The 28-team model reduces that exclusion to just over 48%, a significant psychological and practical shift for developing football nations.

The Quadrennial Shift: From Biennial to Four-Year Cycle

Equally significant is the confirmation of the shift to a four-year cycle after 2028. This change was first proposed in December 2023 and met with considerable debate and criticism from fans, media, and some football administrators. Concerns centered on reducing the frequency of the tournament, potentially diminishing its commercial momentum and developmental rhythm for national teams. CAF’s leadership, however, argues that a longer interval will improve the quality of the tournament by allowing more time for team development, infrastructure projects, and player recovery, while also avoiding calendar congestion with the expanded FIFA World Cup (which will also be held every four years from 2025 onward). The 2027 AFCON in East Africa will be the last held on a two-year cycle before the new rhythm begins.

Analysis: Implications and Challenges of the 28-Team AFCON

The expansion to 28 teams is not a simple numerical adjustment; it is a complex restructuring with wide-ranging consequences for competitive integrity, economics, logistics, and the global football calendar.

Competitive Balance and Tournament Quality

The primary stated goal is to increase competitiveness. By including more teams, the argument goes, a wider pool of nations will be incentivized to invest in their football ecosystems, knowing a pathway to the final tournament exists. This could lead to the emergence of new “dark horse” contenders and reduce the dominance of traditional powerhouses like Egypt, Senegal, and Nigeria in the qualification phase. However, a critical challenge will be maintaining the competitive quality of the final tournament. Adding four teams risks diluting the group stage, potentially creating weaker groups where the outcome is less predictable and high-stakes matches come earlier. The format CAF adopts will be pivotal. Possibilities include:

• Seven groups of four teams, with the group winners and the best five runners-up advancing to a 16-team knockout stage.
• Six groups of four, with the top two from each group plus the four best third-placed teams advancing to a 16-team knockout stage (similar to the current system but with one extra third-place qualifier).
• A hybrid system that might involve a preliminary knockout round for the lowest-ranked qualifiers.

Each option presents different logistical and sporting trade-offs that CAF must resolve.

Economic and Commercial Impact

Expansion is a powerful commercial lever. More teams mean:

• Increased Broadcasting Revenue: More matches provide more inventory for broadcasters to sell, potentially attracting higher rights fees.
• Greater Sponsorship Appeal: A larger, more inclusive tournament offers sponsors access to a wider array of national markets and fan bases across Africa.
• Enhanced Host Nation Benefits: For the host country or countries, an expanded tournament means more matches, longer event duration, and potentially greater tourism and infrastructure investment.
• Higher CAF Revenue: Overall, CAF’s commercial income from the event is projected to rise substantially.

However, these gains must be weighed against significantly increased operational costs for the host(s), including stadium requirements, security, hospitality, and transportation for more teams and fans.

Logistical and Infrastructure Challenges

Accommodating 28 teams requires more venues, more training facilities, and more robust organizational capacity. The current standard for a 24-team AFCON typically requires 6-8 stadiums. A 28-team format may push that requirement to 8-10 stadiums meeting CAF’s Category 3 or 4 standards. This presents a major hurdle for potential host nations, many of which may lack sufficient high-quality infrastructure. It may encourage more joint-bidding (like the 2027 East Africa trio) or accelerate stadium renovation projects across the continent. The increased number of teams also strains the qualification process, which will need to be redesigned to fairly allocate the 28 spots among the 54 member associations.

Impact on Player Welfare and Club Football

The shift to a four-year cycle is partly framed as a player welfare measure, reducing the frequency of major international tournaments. However, the expansion within that cycle means the final tournament itself will be longer, with more matches for players who participate. This creates a tension. The move must be synchronized with the global football calendar, particularly the club season. A longer AFCON could increase friction with European clubs, who are reluctant to release players for extended periods. Clear protocols and cooperation with FIFA and other confederations will be essential.

Strategic Alignment with Global Football Trends

CAF’s decision mirrors a global trend of tournament expansion. The UEFA European Championship moved to 24 teams in 2016 and is considering a 32-team format. The FIFA World Cup expanded to 48 teams for 2026. AFCON’s leap to 28 teams places it among the largest international sporting events by participation. This elevates the commercial and sporting profile of African football on the world stage, potentially increasing its influence within FIFA and global football governance.

Practical Advice: What This Means for Different Stakeholders

For National Football Associations

Smaller and emerging football nations must now develop concrete, long-term strategies to target AFCON qualification. The expanded pathway means realistic qualification dreams are more attainable. Key actions include:

• Invest in Youth Development: Building a sustainable pipeline of talent is more critical than ever to compete over a longer qualification campaign.
• Improve Domestic League Quality: A strong domestic league forms the core of a national team’s player pool.
• Seek Strategic Friendlies: Use qualifiers and friendly matches to gain experience against higher-ranked opponents.
• Analyze the New Qualification Format: Once CAF releases the details, associations must model scenarios and set realistic targets.

Established football powers must adapt their talent identification and development systems to maintain depth, as squad rotation will become even more important to manage player load across a longer tournament.

For Players and Coaches

For players from nations with a history of qualifying, the opportunity to play in an AFCON is now more likely. However, the physical demands of a longer tournament require exceptional professionalism regarding fitness, nutrition, and recovery. Coaches at both national and club levels must manage minutes carefully, especially for key players involved in both domestic and international competitions. The four-year cycle allows for more deliberate, long-term squad building and tactical development.

For Fans and Supporters

F