Attorney General Reviews Afenyo-Markin Police Assault Case: Key Updates on Ghana Minority Leader Incident

Introduction

In a significant development for Ghanaian politics, the Office of the Attorney General (AG) is actively reviewing the case docket titled The Republic v. Alexander Afenyo-Markin, centered on allegations of assault against a police officer. This stems from an incident during the ‘Save the Judiciary’ protest on May 5, 2025, where Minority Leader Alexander Afenyo-Markin, MP for Effutu, is accused of physically attacking a uniformed officer at Parliament House. Confirmed by Deputy Attorney General Justice Srem Sai on November 7, 2025, via social media, the review assesses whether to pursue prosecution.

This Afenyo-Markin police attack case highlights tensions between parliamentary privilege and legal accountability in Ghana. As the nation watches, it raises questions about how high-profile politicians handle public demonstrations and law enforcement interactions. This article provides a clear, step-by-step breakdown of the events, legal processes, and broader implications, optimized for understanding Ghana’s democratic checks and balances.

Why This Matters for Ghanaian Democracy

The case could set precedents for treating alleged criminal conduct by Members of Parliament (MPs), balancing legislative independence with the rule of law. With Afenyo-Markin leading the Minority Caucus since his 2013 entry into Parliament, the outcome may influence future MP-police interactions during protests.

Analysis

The Afenyo-Markin police assault allegation originated amid the ‘Save the Judiciary’ demonstration, organized by civil society groups and opposition figures. Held on May 5, 2025, the protest addressed concerns over judicial independence and perceived political interference, escalating into a verbal confrontation at Parliament House gates.

Eyewitness reports claim Afenyo-Markin physically assaulted the officer. The Ghana Police Service responded swiftly, issuing a statement on May 8, 2025, confirming the Minority Leader voluntarily presented himself for questioning. Following protocol for sitting MPs, the Criminal Investigations Department (CID) sought and received clearance from Speaker Rt. Hon. Alban Bagbin. Afenyo-Markin appeared at CID headquarters in Accra on May 7, 2025, cooperating fully.

Timeline of the Afenyo-Markin Police Attack Incident

• May 5, 2025: ‘Save the Judiciary’ protest; alleged assault occurs.
• May 7, 2025: Afenyo-Markin reports for CID questioning after Speaker’s approval.
• May 8, 2025: Police confirm voluntary cooperation.
• November 7, 2025: Deputy AG Justice Srem Sai announces AG review via social media.
• Ongoing: Prosecutorial assessment for assault charges.

Parliamentary sources note this as one of few recent instances involving senior leaders in police probes during official duties. The Ghana Bar Association observes rising MP-law enforcement cases over the past decade, emphasizing the need for transparent frameworks.

Summary

The Attorney General’s Office is evaluating evidence in the Afenyo-Markin police attack case for potential prosecution. Triggered by an alleged assault on a police officer during a May 2025 protest, the Minority Leader cooperated with investigations. No timeline is set, but a decision could make history as the first such charge against a Minority Leader in over a decade, impacting Ghana’s balance of privilege and accountability.

Key Points

Practical Advice

For politicians, activists, and citizens engaging in protests like the ‘Save the Judiciary’ event, understanding protocols is crucial to avoid Afenyo-Markin-style incidents.

Guidelines for MPs and Protesters

1. Respect Law Enforcement: Maintain calm during interactions; verbal escalations can lead to assault allegations.
2. Follow Parliamentary Protocols: Await Speaker clearance before police questioning to protect privilege.
3. Document Interactions: Use eyewitness accounts or video for transparency in disputes.
4. Seek Legal Counsel Early: Engage lawyers familiar with Ghana’s Criminal Procedure Code for investigations.
5. Cooperate Voluntarily: As Afenyo-Markin did, to demonstrate good faith and expedite reviews.

Civil society organizers should coordinate with police for permits, reducing confrontation risks during judicial independence rallies.

Points of Caution

While the AG review proceeds, several cautions apply to interpreting the Afenyo-Markin police attack developments:

Risks and Considerations

• No Guilty Verdict Yet: The review assesses evidence; prosecution is not guaranteed.
• Media Speculation: Avoid assumptions; stick to verified statements from AG and police.
• Parliamentary Privilege Limits: Does not grant immunity from criminal acts; balance with Article 117 of Ghana’s Constitution.
• Timeline Uncertainty: AG has provided no deadline; expect delays in complex political cases.
• Public Influence: Social media pressure could affect impartiality; rely on official updates.

Comparison

The Afenyo-Markin case echoes past Ghanaian incidents involving MPs and police, but stands out due to the leader’s seniority.

Similar Cases in Ghana

Unlike routine cases, this involves a Minority Leader, potentially elevating scrutiny compared to junior MPs.

Legal Implications

Under Ghanaian law, MPs enjoy parliamentary privilege per Article 117 of the 1992 Constitution, protecting speeches and votes but not exempting criminal acts like assault under the Criminal Offences Act, 1960 (Act 29). The AG’s role, per Article 88, involves prosecutorial discretion.

Key Legal Frameworks

• CID Protocols: Mandatory Speaker clearance for MP questioning (Standing Orders).
• Assault Charges: Section 84 of Act 29; penalties up to 3 years if proven.
• Precedent Potential: First Minority Leader prosecution in over 10 years could clarify privilege boundaries.
• Rule of Law: Reinforces equality before the law, as per Article 17.

If prosecuted, Afenyo-Markin could face trial while in office, testing separation of powers without speculation on guilt.

Conclusion

The AG’s review of the Afenyo-Markin police attack incident underscores Ghana’s commitment to accountability amid political tensions. From the May 2025 ‘Save the Judiciary’ protest to ongoing assessments, it exemplifies procedural integrity. Observers await a decision that could shape MP-law enforcement relations, reinforcing democratic principles. Stay informed via official channels for updates on this landmark case.

FAQ