Alleged $42m fraud: Court fixes Jan 27 for trial of Briton, 2 Indians

Introduction

In a landmark legal proceeding unfolding in Lagos, Nigeria, a Federal High Court has set January 27, 2026, as the trial date for a high-profile financial fraud case involving a British national and two Indian businessmen. The defendants, Marcus Wade (chairman of Wilben Trade Limited, Dubai) and Prem Garg and Devashish Garg (Indian nationals linked to Agrico Agbe Limited, Nigeria), face accusations of conspiring to defraud $42.48 million through a rice importation scheme. This case, marked by repeated adjournments and complex cross-border legal challenges, highlights the growing scrutiny of financial crimes in Nigeria’s judicial system. The trial date underscores the Nigerian judiciary’s efforts to address systemic delays while addressing allegations of fraud under Sections 421 and 422 of the Criminal Code Act. This article examines the case’s intricacies, legal frameworks, and implications for international business practices.

Analysis

Legal Framework and Charges

The prosecution alleges that the defendants orchestrated a scheme to secure a $42 million loan between May and September 2015 under the guise of importing Indian parboiled rice into Nigeria. However, the funds were reportedly diverted to other purposes, violating Sections 421 and 422 of the Nigeria’s Criminal Code Act (Cap C38, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004). These sections criminalize fraudulent misrepresentation and breach of trust in financial transactions, punishable by fines and imprisonment.

Case Progression and Jurisdictional Challenges

Since its filing in 2022, the case has faced repeated adjournments, primarily due to the defendants’ failure to appear in court. Justice Akintayo Aluko, presiding over the matter, adjourned the trial indefinitely until January 27, 2026, to accommodate the defendants’ legal teams. The prolonged delays reflect broader systemic issues in Nigeria’s judiciary, particularly when international parties or companies are involved.

Financial Compliance Allegations

Adding to the complexity, lawyers representing Zenith Bank, Guaranty Trust Bank (GTB), and Citi Bank testified that the defendants’ firms did not hold accounts with their institutions. This evidence supports the prosecution’s claim that the funds were misappropriated, as no legitimate transactions were traced to the accused parties’ bank accounts.

Summary

The alleged $42 million fraud case centers on three individuals and two companies accused of fraudulent financial dealings under the cover of rice imports. Despite multiple legal challenges and international defendant absences, the trial will proceed on January 27, 2026. The prosecution relies on forensic banking records and witness testimonies to establish fraud, while the defense has yet to substantiate claims of judicial misconduct. The case serves as a warning against financial malpractice, particularly in cross-border transactions involving Nigerian firms.

Key Points

Practical Advice

Due Diligence in Financial Transactions

Businesses engaging in international trade should conduct rigorous due diligence to avoid accusations of fraud. This includes verifying the legitimacy of counterparties, maintaining transparent records, and ensuring compliance with local and international financial regulations.

Navigating Nigerian Legal Systems

Foreign entities operating in Nigeria must understand local statutes, including the Criminal Code Act, to mitigate legal risks. Engaging qualified legal counsel with expertise in Nigerian jurisprudence is critical for dispute resolution.

Handling Cross-Border Legal Challenges

This case underscores the importance of proactive communication with international courts. Defendants should cooperate fully with judicial processes to avoid additional penalties, such as asset freezes or travel bans.

Points of Caution

• Ensure all financial agreements include clear terms to prevent misinterpretation.
• Verify the legal status of international partners to avoid entanglement in fraud cases.
• Promptly address court-adjournment requests to prevent indictment by default.
• Be aware of the Nigerian government’s role in freezing accounts linked to unlawful transactions.

Comparison

While this case mirrors high-profile financial fraud trials in the U.S. and UK, Nigeria’s approach emphasizes aggressive prosecution of cross-border scams under the Criminal Code Act. Unlike Western jurisdictions, where civil litigation often precedes criminal charges, Nigerian courts can initiate criminal proceedings directly, accelerating accountability in complex financial crimes.

Legal Implications

Criminal Penalties Under Nigerian Law

If convicted, the defendants face fines up to ₦50 million ($130,000) and up to 25 years’ imprisonment per offense under Sections 421 and 422. The case also risks setting a precedent for prosecuting white-collar crimes involving multinational corporations.

Impact on International Business

Companies partnering with the accused parties may face reputational damage or financial liabilities. This case could deter foreign investors from engaging with Nigerian businesses without thorough compliance checks.

Conclusion

The alleged $42 million fraud case in Nigeria exemplifies the challenges of prosecuting cross-border financial crimes. With the trial scheduled for January 2026, the outcome may shape Nigeria’s legal strategies in combating fraud and reinforce the importance of ethical business practices. Stakeholders must prioritize transparency and compliance to navigate Nigeria’s evolving regulatory landscape.

FAQ