Atiku joins Sowore to demand Nnamdi Kanu’s launch

Introduction

On 9 October 2025, former Nigerian Vice President Atiku Abubakar publicly endorsed a nationwide campaign spearheaded by activist‑politician Omoyele Sowore. The campaign demands the immediate release—or a fair trial—of Nnamdi Kanu, the detained leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB). This article explains why the two high‑profile figures are aligning, outlines the political and legal context, and offers practical guidance for citizens who wish to support the cause.

Analysis

Background of the Kanu Detention

Nnamdi Kanu, a prominent Biafran separatist, was arrested in 2021 on charges of treason, terrorism, and unlawful assembly. Despite a series of bail orders from the Federal High Court, the government has repeatedly denied his release, citing security concerns. Critics argue that the prolonged detention undermines Nigeria’s constitutional guarantee of the right to a fair trial and fuels ethnic tensions, especially in the South‑East.

Atiku’s Public Statement

In a post on his official X (formerly Twitter) account, Atiku described Kanu’s continued incarceration as “an open sore on our nation’s conscience” and “a stain on our belief in the rule of law.” He accused the executive of “defying court orders that granted bail” and called the practice “an abuse of power and an assault on justice.” By aligning with Sowore, Atiku seeks to position himself as a defender of due process and a unifying figure across ethnic lines.

Sowore’s Campaign Strategy

Omoyele Sowore, a former presidential candidate and founder of the Online Nigeria platform, announced a “peaceful, organized, visible march to Aso Rock Villa” on 10 October. The rally aims to pressure the Federal Government into either releasing Kanu or guaranteeing a transparent trial. Sowore’s invitation extends to governors, senators, traditional rulers, religious leaders, and ordinary Nigerians who “believe in Kanu’s freedom.” He also singled out high‑profile politicians—Governor Charles Chukwuma Soludo of Anambra, Governor Alex Otti of Abia, former President Peter Obi, and Senator Enyinnaya Abaribe—urging them to join the march.

Response from Targeted Leaders

Following Sowore’s outreach, a follow‑up post revealed mixed reactions. Governor Alex Otti and Governor Charles Soludo did not respond to calls or messages, while Peter Obi’s team acknowledged the invitation, and Senator Abaribe promised a reply. The lack of uniform engagement underscores the political sensitivity surrounding the IPOB issue.

Media Coverage and Public Reaction

The story first appeared on Vanguard News and quickly spread across social media platforms. Supporters praised the coalition of Atiku and Sowore as a “new chapter in Nigeria’s fight for human rights,” while detractors warned that the march could inflame separatist sentiments.

Summary

Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar has joined forces with activist Omoyele Sowore to demand the release—or at least a fair judicial process—for detained IPOB leader Nnamdi Kanu. Atiku’s condemnation of the government’s handling of Kanu’s case frames the issue as a matter of national conscience and the rule of law. Sowore’s planned peaceful march to Aso Rock aims to galvanize a broad coalition of political, religious, and traditional leaders. While some targeted officials have responded positively, others remain silent, reflecting the delicate political balance.

Key Points

Practical Advice

How Citizens Can Participate Safely

1. Stay informed: Follow verified accounts of Atiku, Sowore, and reputable news outlets for real‑time updates.
2. Verify rally details: Ensure you have the correct date, time, and meeting point before attending any gathering.
3. Maintain peace: The march is intended to be non‑violent; avoid bringing weapons or provocative symbols.
4. Document responsibly: Use smartphones to record the event for transparency, but respect privacy and local regulations.
5. Know your rights: Familiarize yourself with the Nigerian Constitution’s provisions on freedom of assembly and expression.

Engaging Online

Support the cause digitally by:

• Sharing verified posts with hashtags such as #FreeKanu, #AtikuForJustice, and #SoworeMarch.
• Tagging elected officials to encourage public accountability.
• Participating in moderated forums that discuss legal and humanitarian aspects of the case.

Points of Caution

While the march is framed as peaceful, participants should be aware of potential risks:

• Security presence: Law enforcement may deploy officers to monitor the rally, which could lead to arrests if the assembly is deemed unlawful.
• Political backlash: Aligning with a controversial figure like Kanu may affect personal or professional relationships.
• Misinformation: Unverified rumors can spread quickly; always cross‑check information before sharing.

Comparison

Comparing this campaign with previous Nigerian political movements highlights both similarities and differences:

Legal Implications

Several legal dimensions intersect with the campaign:

Constitutional Rights

Article 40 of the 1999 Nigerian Constitution guarantees the right to peaceful assembly. Any government action that disperses the march without due process could be challenged in court as a violation of this right.

Judicial Orders vs. Executive Action

The Federal High Court has issued bail orders for Kanu. Ignoring these orders may constitute contempt of court, exposing the executive to legal sanctions. Conversely, the government may argue that national security overrides bail provisions—a stance that would need robust judicial scrutiny.

Potential Criminal Liability

Participants must be cautious about charges such as “unlawful assembly” or “incitement of public disorder.” Legal counsel advises that organizers obtain any required permits and that participants avoid actions that could be construed as violent.

International Human Rights Law

Detention without trial may breach the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), to which Nigeria is a party. International NGOs could amplify pressure if domestic remedies fail.

Conclusion

The alliance between Atiku Abubakar and Omoyele Sowore marks a significant moment in Nigeria’s ongoing struggle over civil liberties, ethnic identity, and the rule of law. By framing Nnamdi Kanu’s detention as a national moral wound, they aim to mobilize a cross‑section of society—politicians, traditional rulers, religious leaders, and ordinary citizens. The success of the campaign will hinge on the government’s willingness to respect court orders, the public’s capacity to organize peacefully, and the international community’s attention to due‑process standards. Regardless of the outcome, the episode underscores the power of high‑profile advocacy in shaping Nigeria’s democratic discourse.

FAQ