Here is a rewritten, comprehensive, and SEO-optimized article based on the details provided, structured for clarity, authority, and search engine visibility.

Court Remands Physician Over Faux Medical Record Related to Blogger Just Adetoun

By James Ogunnaike, Abeokuta

In a significant legal development within Ogun State, a medical doctor has been remanded in custody for allegedly fabricating a medical report to aid a popular blogger, Adetoun Onajobi (popularly known as Just Adetoun), in evading police arrest. The incident highlights growing concerns regarding cybercrime, the integrity of medical documentation, and the legal consequences of spreading misinformation online.

This article provides a detailed analysis of the case, exploring the background of the allegations, the legal framework involved, and the broader implications for digital accountability and medical ethics.

Introduction

The Ogun State Executive, represented by the Attorney General and Commissioner for Justice, Mr. Oluwasina Ogungbade (SAN), has issued a formal statement regarding the detention of a medical professional. The doctor is accused of aiding blogger Adetoun Onajobi by providing a fraudulent medical certificate, a move intended to excuse her absence from police questioning.

The case stems from a petition lodged against the blogger by the state government. As cybercrime and digital defamation remain critical issues in Nigeria’s legal landscape, this incident serves as a case study on the intersection of social media influence, legal obligations, and ethical medical practice.

Key Points

Background

The controversy began following an accident involving world-champion boxer Anthony Joshua in Ogun State. Adetoun Onajobi utilized her social media platforms to criticize the state government’s response to the incident.

She alleged that there were no functioning ambulance services anywhere in the state. Furthermore, she accused Governor Dapo Abiodun of being absent in Ghana, engaging in partying, and impregnating women rather than attending to the boxer’s welfare.

State Government’s Response

Mr. Oluwasina Ogungbade (SAN), the Attorney General, categorically denied these allegations. He stated that Ogun State operates multiple state-owned and state-supported ambulance services. The government characterized the blogger’s claims as false, malicious, and deceptive, noting that such misinformation poses a genuine public safety risk by discouraging citizens from utilizing available healthcare services.

Escalation to Legal Action

Due to the nature of the allegations, the state government reported Adetoun to the police for alleged violations of the Cybercrimes Act, 2015. The police subsequently issued a formal notice of invitation on January 2, 2026, requesting her presence for questioning on January 5, 2026.

Analysis

The situation escalated when the blogger failed to honor the police invitation. Despite previous boasts of possessing evidence to substantiate her claims, Adetoun reportedly went into hiding.

The Fake Medical Report

While in hiding, Adetoun released another video claiming she was medically unfit to report to the police. Subsequently, her legal representatives submitted a letter to the police accompanied by a medical report from a Lagos-based physician.

However, police investigations revealed discrepancies in the documentation. The medical report was deemed fraudulent. The physician in question allegedly confessed that he never met, examined, or treated Adetoun, directly contradicting the claims made in the document.

Legal Implications of Medical Forgery

The act of presenting a forged medical document to law enforcement constitutes a serious criminal offense. It falls under forgery and obstruction of justice. By providing false information to the police, the physician allegedly attempted to mislead the investigation, leading to his arrest, charge, and remand.

Credibility and Digital Accountability

Mr. Ogungbade raised a critical logical point regarding the blogger’s conduct: if she possessed genuine evidence to back her public accusations against the Governor, why was she unable to present it to law enforcement or publish it publicly? The reliance on a forged medical excuse has arguably undermined her credibility further.

Practical Advice

This case offers several lessons for social media users, medical professionals, and the general public regarding digital conduct and legal compliance.

For Social Media Users and Influencers

Understand the Cybercrimes Act: The Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, etc.) Act of 2015 in Nigeria criminalizes cyberstalking, harassment, and the spread of false information. Users must verify facts before publishing claims, especially against public officials.

Cooperation with Law Enforcement: Ignoring police invitations or going into hiding can be interpreted as an admission of guilt or contempt of the law. Legal counsel should be sought immediately, and cooperation is often the safest route.

For Medical Professionals

Ethical Documentation: Medical reports must be based on actual patient history, examination, and findings. Issuing a “faux” or “fake” medical report is a violation of medical ethics and the law.

Consequences of Forgery: As seen in this case, medical professionals involved in legal subterfuge face arrest, charges, and potential imprisonment. Integrity in medical documentation is non-negotiable.

For the General Public

Verifying Health Information: Public safety relies on accurate information. Spreading false claims about the unavailability of emergency services (like ambulances) can endanger lives. Always verify emergency contact numbers and resources provided by local authorities.

FAQ

Conclusion

The remand of the physician in Ogun State serves as a stark reminder of the legal weight carried by documentation and digital speech. The case against Adetoun Onajobi underscores the importance of accountability in the digital age; spreading misinformation has tangible legal consequences.

As the investigation continues, the outcome will likely set a precedent for how the state handles cases involving cybercrime, medical fraud, and public defamation. The integrity of medical professionals and the responsibility of social media influencers are both under scrutiny in this high-profile legal battle.