Family of Overdue Sawla-Tuna-Kalba MP Appeals to President Mahama Over GHS944,955 Burial Blockade
Introduction
The family of Joseph Trumah Bayel, the late Member of Parliament (MP) for Sawla-Tuna-Kalba, has launched an urgent appeal to President John Dramani Mahama, seeking intervention in a financial dispute that threatens to prevent the peaceful burial of their deceased relative. The case, deeply rooted in personal, political, and legal complexities, has captured national attention as it underscores broader issues in Ghanaian politics, land disputes, and family obligations. This comprehensive article explores the background, legal points, practical advice, and frequently asked questions surrounding the tragic incident and the ongoing blockade.
Key Points
- Overdue MP’s Family Appeals: The family of Joseph Trumah Bayel, a prominent MP from Sawla-Tuna-Kalba, appeals to President Mahama for assistance in settling a GHS944,955 fine demanded by the Tuna Chief.
- Dispute Origin: The financial demand is tied to a protracted court case over land ownership and fence destruction between the MP and local chiefs.
- Family’s Request: The family urges President Mahama’s intervention to respect the late MP’s final wishes and resolve the issue to allow for a dignified burial.
- Legal Background: The dispute began in the early 1990s over land development, escalating to a judicial process in the Wa High Court.
- Public Reaction: The case has drawn public and political scrutiny, with accusations of political mockery and interference by the opposition.
- Practical Advice: The article offers guidance on resolving political and legal disputes in Ghana and the importance of mediation and legal representation.
- Conclusion: The case exemplifies the intersection of personal tragedy, legal battles, and political influence in Ghana.
Background
The Life and Death of MP Joseph Trumah Bayel
Joseph Trumah Bayel, a respected member of the National Democratic Congress (NDC), served as the MP for Sawla-Tuna-Kalba from 1993 to 2005. He was known for his contributions to local development and for championing the interests of his constituency. Tragically, he passed away in August 2025, just months before the end of his parliamentary term.
Land Dispute Origins
The dispute in question dates back to the late 1990s. Joseph Trumah Bayel acquired a two-acre parcel of land, developed it with residential structures, planted mango and orange trees, and installed a borehole. The land was secured by an iron fence, which was reportedly dismantled by local authorities in 2020.
Affirmation of Ownership and Allegations
The family has consistently maintained that the late MP owned and cultivated the land for over three decades. They refute claims that he withheld farm produce from local chiefs and accuse the current Chief of Tuna of targeting the MP’s property for political gain. The family alleges that, after the fence was destroyed, sea sand was dumped on the land, but no action was taken by the authorities.
Analysis
The Legal and Financial Implications
The case has escalated to a level that threatens basic human rights, particularly the right to a dignified burial. According to the family, the Chief of Tuna, Tunawura Daniel Mahama Amantana, has imposed a GHS944,955 fine, citing court-related costs and damages. The family disputes this figure, stating that the fine is excessive and lacks legal basis.
Political Alliances and Public Scrutiny
The family’s appeal has highlighted the longstanding relationship between the late MP and President Mahama. They point to past instances of mutual respect, such as the President’s attendance at the MP’s mother’s funeral. However, the current situation has sparked criticism, as the family feels abandoned and embattled. The opposition party, the New Patriotic Party (NPP), has capitalized on the incident, mocking the NDC’s inability to resolve the issue.
Media and Public Perception
The case has been extensively covered in Ghanaian media, with Life Pulse Daily and PleasureNews providing regular updates. The family’s appeal has resonated with the public, who view the incident as a distressing example of political interference in personal matters.
Practical Advice
Steps to Resolve Political and Legal Disputes
- Seek Mediation: Engage neutral third parties or community leaders to mediate and facilitate dialogue between all parties involved.
- Legal Representation: Hire experienced lawyers to represent your interests in court, ensuring that legal processes are followed and that your rights are protected.
- Public Communication: Maintain open communication with the public and relevant authorities, clarifying your position and seeking support from community leaders and political allies.
- Document Everything: Keep detailed records of all communications, court filings, and financial transactions related to the dispute.
- Pursue Peaceful Resolution: Aim for a peaceful resolution that respects the rights and dignity of all parties involved.
FAQ
Why is the family appealing to President Mahama?
The family believes that President Mahama’s intervention and influence can help expedite a peaceful resolution to the burial dispute and ensure that the late MP receives a dignified farewell.
What is the amount in question, and why is it disputed?
The Chief of Tuna has demanded a fine of GHS944,955, citing court costs and damages. The family disputes this figure, arguing that the fine is excessive and lacks legal justification.
Is the land dispute related to the late MP’s death?
No. The land dispute predates the MP’s death. It stems from a long-running legal battle over land ownership and development in the Tuna enclave, initiated by the MP and local authorities.
What role has the opposition party played in this incident?
The opposition party, the New Patriotic Party (NPP), has taken advantage of the situation, mocking the National Democratic Congress (NDC) and the inability of the NDC and President Mahama to resolve the issue.
How can the public support the family’s appeal?
The public can support the family by raising awareness of the issue, encouraging dialogue between the family and local authorities, and advocating for a peaceful resolution that respects the late MP’s wishes.
Conclusion
The case of Joseph Trumah Bayel’s family highlights the intersection of personal tragedy, legal disputes, and political influence in Ghana. The family’s appeal for aid from President Mahama underscores the broader issue of justice and human rights in the political arena. As the case continues to unfold, it serves as a reminder of the importance of mediation, legal representation, and public engagement in resolving complex disputes.
Leave a comment