Attacks on Journalists: A Critical Moment for Press Freedom in Ghana

Introduction

In a powerful and urgent address, Albert Dwumfour, President of the Ghana Journalists Association (GJA), has condemned a wave of recent attacks on journalists across the country. Speaking at a press conference held on January 28, 2026, at the Accra International Press Centre, Dwumfour outlined a series of violent incidents targeting reporters, demanded swift justice, and set non-negotiable standards for journalist safety. This statement comes at a pivotal moment for press freedom in Ghana, as journalists face increasing threats while carrying out their constitutional duties.

Key Points

Background

Ghana has long been regarded as a beacon of press freedom in West Africa, with a constitution that guarantees media independence and freedom of expression. However, recent events have raised serious concerns about the safety of journalists in the country. The Ghana Journalists Association, established to protect and promote the interests of media practitioners, has found itself increasingly called upon to respond to incidents of violence and intimidation against its members.

The current wave of attacks appears to coincide with heightened political tensions and ongoing conflicts in certain regions, particularly the protracted Bawku conflict in the Upper East Region. These incidents represent not isolated events but rather a pattern of behavior that threatens the fundamental rights of journalists to report without fear of reprisal.

Analysis

The statement by GJA President Dwumfour represents a significant escalation in the Association’s response to attacks on journalists. By setting clear “red lines” and demanding specific actions within defined timeframes, the GJA is signaling that it will no longer accept rhetorical condemnations without concrete follow-through.

The targeting of journalists covering demonstrations and conflicts is particularly concerning, as it suggests an attempt to control the narrative around sensitive issues. When security personnel attack reporters covering protests—such as the farmers’ demonstration in Kukurantumi or the Class FM journalist at Kasoa—it raises questions about transparency and accountability in governance.

The designation of the Bawku conflict zone as an “early warning area” is a strategic move that acknowledges both the severity of threats in that region and the need for proactive measures rather than reactive responses. This approach recognizes that preventing attacks is more effective than responding after journalists have been harmed.

The 14-day ultimatum given to the Ghana National Fire Service represents a tactical shift toward more assertive advocacy. By threatening “drastic measures” including blacklisting, the GJA is demonstrating that it possesses leverage and is willing to use it to protect its members.

Practical Advice

For journalists working in potentially dangerous situations, the following precautions are recommended:

1. **Risk Assessment**: Before covering volatile events, conduct thorough risk assessments and have contingency plans in place.

2. **Documentation**: Maintain detailed records of any threats or incidents, including times, locations, and identifying information about perpetrators.

3. **Communication**: Establish check-in protocols with colleagues and editors, especially when covering conflict zones.

4. **Legal Knowledge**: Familiarize yourself with relevant laws protecting journalists and your constitutional rights.

5. **Association Support**: Maintain active membership with professional associations like the GJA, which can provide legal support and advocacy.

6. **Digital Security**: Implement strong digital security practices to protect sources and sensitive information.

7. **Physical Security**: Consider personal safety training and appropriate protective equipment when necessary.

For media organizations:

1. **Safety Protocols**: Develop comprehensive safety protocols for field reporting.

2. **Insurance**: Provide appropriate insurance coverage for journalists working in high-risk environments.

3. **Legal Support**: Ensure access to legal counsel when journalists face threats or legal challenges.

4. **Mental Health**: Offer psychological support for journalists exposed to traumatic events.

FAQ

Conclusion

The statement by GJA President Albert Dwumfour represents a watershed moment in Ghana’s media landscape. By refusing to accept anything less than full accountability for attacks on journalists, the Association is drawing a clear line in the sand. The incidents described—from the assault on Class FM’s Samuel Addo to the threats against journalists in Bawku—paint a troubling picture of a profession under siege.

However, the response from the GJA also demonstrates the strength and resilience of Ghana’s journalistic community. By setting non-negotiable standards, demanding specific actions, and threatening consequences for non-compliance, the Association is asserting its role as a guardian of press freedom. The call for a meeting between the President and security chiefs acknowledges that protecting journalists requires systemic change, not just individual accountability.

As Ghana approaches significant political events, including the NPP presidential primary, the safety of journalists becomes even more critical. The media’s ability to report freely and without fear is not just a professional concern but a cornerstone of democratic governance. The GJA’s stance sends a clear message: attacks on journalists will no longer be tolerated, and those responsible will be held accountable.

The coming weeks will be crucial in determining whether the commitments made in this statement translate into meaningful action. For the sake of Ghana’s democracy, press freedom, and the safety of those who work to inform the public, the hope is that institutions will respond with the urgency and seriousness that this moment demands.