Ayikoi Otoo Expresses Shock Over Daniel Domelovo’s Alleged Political Leaning

Introduction: The Unraveling of Political Tensions

In a recent development that has stirred the legal and political landscape of Ghana, former Attorney-General and counsel to former Chief Justice Gertrude Torkonoo, Ayikoi Otoo, has voiced his disbelief at allegations by Daniel Domelovo, the former Auditor-General. The controversy centers around claims of “fake evidence” submitted during the committee’s proceedings on Torkonoo’s dismissal. This incident highlights the growing intersections between audits, legal processes, and political implications in Ghana’s governance structures.

Analysis: Decoding the Allegations and Responses

Ayikoi Otoo’s Perspective

Otoo, appearing on Joy FM’s Top Story on October 7, 2025, described his reaction to Domelovo’s accusations of fraud as “shocking.” A seasoned legal professional, Otoo emphasized his confidence in the integrity of the audit process that exonerated then-Chief Justice Torkonoo. He asserted that Domelovo’s dismissal of the administration letter and audit findings—despite being aware of their validity—revealed a politically motivated stance.

Domelovo’s Counterclaim

Domelovo, who served on the committee investigating Torkonoo’s removal, accused Otoo of fabricating evidence. He argued that the documents submitted during the proceedings were inconsistent with audit protocols. This accusation has sparked debates about the transparency of judicial investigations and the accountability of public officials.

The Context of Audit and Legal Procedures

The heart of the matter lies in the interplay between audit reports, administration letters, and their acceptance by the judicial system. Otoo explained that the administration letter—signed by the Judicial Secretary—provided a rationale for disputed expenditures, which resolved the matter prior to Domelovo’s recent allegations. This raises questions about the hierarchy of evidence in legal proceedings.

Summary: Key Takeaways from the Controversy

The dispute between

Key Points

Practical Advice for Navigating Legal Controversies

Understanding Audit Processes

Legal proceedings often involve multiple layers of documentation, including audit reports and administrative clarifications. For instance, Otoo’s defense hinges on the acceptance of the administration letter as a valid resolution to audit queries.

Evaluating Sources Critically

In politically charged cases, it’s crucial to cross-reference statements with official records. Otoo’s reference to the Director of Finance further corroborates his claim that the audit issues were resolved, as documented in verified reports.

Points of Caution

Beware of Misinformation

Public discourse often amplifies sensational claims—like “fake evidence”—without contextual analysis. Otoo’s case underscores the importance of verifying allegations against documented legal precedents and administrative records.

Professional Accountability in Public Roles

Domelovo’s criticism reads as a breach of professional ethics, given his familiarity with audit procedures. The affair illustrates how personal agendas can distort transparent processes, potentially undermining public trust in institutions.

Comparison: Otoo vs. Domelovo

Legal Implications: What’s at Stake?

Accusing a public official of submitting “fake evidence” carries serious consequences under Ghana’s legal framework. Section 11 of the Public Procurement Act, 2003, criminalizes fraudulent documentation in administrative processes. However, without evidence of intent or material harm, such claims

Potential Outcomes

• If Domelovo’s claim is substantiated: Criminal charges under the same act.
• If Otoo’s defense holds: Domelovo may face defamation or professional disciplinary actions.

Conclusion: Lessons from a High-Stakes Dispute

The clash between Ayikoi Otoo and Daniel Domelovo underscores the fragility of impartiality in Ghana’s governance. As a pedagogical example, this controversy illustrates the need for transparency in audit processes, adherence to legal protocols, and

FAQ: Addressing Common Queries

What are the legal implications of accusing someone of submitting fake evidence?

Such allegations can lead to charges of fraud or defamation under Ghana’s criminal code, depending on intent and evidence.

How does an administration letter resolve audit discrepancies?

An administration letter provides an official response from the spending authority (e.g., the Judicial Secretary),