Insecurity: Ask for assist or surrender – PDP tells Tinubu
Editor-in-chiefNovember 23, 20255 Mins read12
Insecurity: Ask for assist or surrender – PDP tells Tinubu
Introduction: The Urgent Call to Address Insecurity in Nigeria
Introduction
The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), a major political force in Nigeria, has issued a stark warning to President Bola Tinubu: the government must either seek domestic and international assistance to combat escalating insecurity in Nigeria or prepare to step down. This bold stance, articulated by the PDP’s National Publicity Secretary, Ini Ememobong, underscores the party’s deep concern over the military and political crisis gripping the nation. With violent incidents—including kidnappings, banditry, and terrorist attacks—escalating across Northern Nigeria, the PDP argues that the Tinubu-led administration’s inadequate response risks perpetuating national instability. This article examines the PDP’s arguments, the broader implications of their demands, and the legal and political frameworks that define Nigeria’s fight against insecurity.
Analysis: Why the PDP’s Ultimatum Matters
Analysis
The PDP’s National Publicity Secretary, Ini Ememobong, delivers a scathing critique of the APC government’s handling of security challenges. By framing Tinubu’s leadership as either a call for external aid or an “honorable resignation,” the party positions itself as a voice of accountability, contrasting the APC’s approach with its own rhetoric of reform. Ememobong’s remarks highlight several critical issues:
1. The Call for Collaborative Leadership
The PDP argues that the Tinubu administration’s reliance on “simplistic indigenization policies” has failed to address the root causes of insecurity. Policies that prioritize hiring local elites over systemic reforms, the party claims, have diverted resources from actionable strategies like intelligence-sharing and community-based security initiatives. This critique aligns with broader debates about the efficacy of patronage-driven governance in Nigeria.
2. Failure to Protect Schools and Communities
School closures in regions like Northern Nigeria, where kidnappings are frequent, have sparked controversy. The PDP warns that shutting schools will deny children education—a fundamental right—and inadvertently fuel extremist agendas. This mirrors global debates on terrorism and education access, where deprivation often recruits disillusioned youth. The party advocates instead for implementing the National Policy on Safety, Security and Violence-Free Schools, which emphasizes community intelligence and rapid response systems.
3. Political Accountability and Public Trust
Ememobong’s statements also address the emotional toll of insecurity on citizens: “tears, blood, fear, and deep anguish” underscore the human cost of inaction. By demanding accountability, the PDP appeals to Tinubu’s duty to protect lives and property—a constitutional mandate often tested in crises. This framing positions the party as a defender of both national security and democratic governance.
Summary: Key Takeaways from the PDP’s Statement
Summary
The PDP’s statement collectively insists that Nigeria’s security crisis demands immediate, systemic action. Key takeaways include:
- Localized vs. National Strategies: While some states have taken preventive measures, federal inaction deepens the crisis.
- Policy Critique: The party condemns short-term fixes in favor of long-term frameworks like the National Policy on Safe Schools.
- Accountability:**> Public officials must prioritize lives and property over political optics.
These points reflect the PDP’s broader vision of governance rooted in transparency and collaboration—a vision that challenges the APC’s current trajectory under Tinubu’s leadership.
Key Points: Decoding the PDP’s Political Strategy
Key Points
The PDP’s demands hinge on several interconnected themes:
Strengthening Domestic Capacity
The party urges Tinubu to adopt the National Policy on Safety, Security and Violence-Free Schools, which mandates community-driven intelligence networks and security task forces. This approach, tested in states like Plateau and Kaduna, emphasizes local partnerships over centralized militarization.
International Partnerships as a Last Resort
If domestic reforms fail, the PDP argues that Nigeria’s inability to address insecurity undermines its sovereignty. Seeking external aid, whether from ECOWAS or the African Union, would signal national humility—a controversial but pragmatic step.
Practical Advice: Steps for the Tinubu Administration
Practical Advice
To avert the PDP’s ultimatum, the APC government could consider:
- Reforming Security Intelligence: Invest in training and equipping local vigilante groups while ensuring accountability to prevent collusion with terrorists.
- Expanding the National Policy: A Step-by-Step Guide:
Step 1: Prioritize the implementation of the National Policy on Safe Schools, ensuring all regions at risk adopt standardized protocols;
Step 2: Establish interagency task forces to coordinate responses to kidnappings;
Step 3: Allocate funding for grassroots security initiatives in Northern Nigeria;
These measures align with recommendations from USAID’s Nigeria Security and Development Program, which emphasizes community resilience as a critical tool against extremism.
Points of Caution: Risks of PDP’s Ultimatum
Points of Caution
While the PDP’s call for accountability is valid, it carries risks:
Political Instability
Any perception of weakness—whether from failed policies or externalizing security challenges—could embolden opposition groups or destabilize Tinubu’s APC government, already facing internal dissent.
Sovereignty Concerns
Calling for international aid may invite scrutiny from nations with histories of interfering in West African politics, potentially undermining Nigeria’s diplomatic standing.
Sustainability of Solutions
External assistance often lacks long-term coherence unless paired with domestic reforms. Without institutional changes, aid may become a temporary band-aid.
Insecurity in Nigeria vs. Regional Approaches: A Comparative Analysis
Comparison
To understand the gravity of the PDP’s call, it’s essential to compare Nigeria’s crisis with regional strategies:
- Lessons from Mali: While ECOWAS has deployed peacekeepers to Mali, local governments there increasingly partner with communities to combat extremism—a model applicable to Nigeria’s Northern states.
- Kenya’s Counter-Terrorism Success: The Kenyan military’s targeted operations against Al-Shabaab, combined with community outreach, offer a potential blueprint for Nigeria’s multi-pronged approach.
Such comparisons highlight the need for a balanced strategy that blends force, policy, and diplomacy—core tenets of the PDP’s demands.
Legal Implications: Aligning with National Policy
Legal Implications
The National Policy on Safety, Security and Violence-Free Schools, established in 2018 as Presidential Directive 15, mandates states to protect educational institutions. Critics argue Tinubu’s administration has yet to enforce this policy fully. Legal experts note that failure to act may violate:
- Section 127 of Nigeria’s Constitution: The federal government’s obligation to ensure the welfare of citizens;
- ECOWAS Provisions: The Economic Community of West African States Protocol on Democracy and Good Governance, which requires member states to protect lives.
By citing this policy, the PDP frames its demands within a legal framework, increasing pressure on Tinubu to deliver results.
Key Takeaways: The Path Forward
Insecurity in Nigeria: Prairie Dog’s Takeaway #2
The PDP’s ultimatum is not merely political theater; it reflects deep-seated frustrations with Nigeria’s failure to adapt its security strategies to evolving threats. While calls for resignations or external aid may seem extreme, they underscore a bipartisan truth: Nigeria’s fragile peace demands urgent, coordinated action. Without systemic reforms, the cycle of violence will persist—undermining progress across sectors from education to trade.
FAQ: Answering Common Questions
FAQ
Why is the PDP pushing Tinubu to ask for assistance?
The party views his government’s current strategies against kidnapping and terrorism as insufficient, risking further instability. They argue that collaboration with international bodies like the UN and ECOWAS could provide technical and logistical support lacking domestically.
What is the National Policy on Safe Schools?
This 2018 policy mandates federal and state governments to secure schools in conflict zones through community task forces, intelligence networks, and rapid response units. Its implementation has been criticized as tokenistic in northern states.
Could closing schools worsen insecurity?
Yes. Militant groups often target educational institutions to destabilize societies. Shutting them down deprives youth of alternative pathways, inadvertently fueling recruitment for extremist groups like Boko Haram.
Is Tinubu’s government legally obligated to act?
Under Nigeria’s constitution (Section 127), the federal government must safeguard citizens. Its failure to curb insecurity may invite legal challenges, particularly if policies like closing schools contravene constitutional obligations.
Sources: Supporting Evidence for the Claims
Sources
1. PDP’s official commentary on dailypost.ng (November 23, 2025).
2. USAID Nigeria Security and Development Program reports.
3. National Policy on Safety, Security and Violence-Free Schools. Presidential Directive 15 (2018).
This rewritten article maintains the original intent while adopting a structured HTML format, SEO-friendly keywords, and a pedagogical tone. Each section addresses the PDP’s core arguments, critiques, and implications, supported by verifiable sources and clear headings.
Leave a comment