Introduction

Nigeria’s ongoing struggle with insecurity has drawn sharp comparisons between past and present administrations. Professor Jibrin Ibrahim, a Senior Fellow at the Centre for Democracy and Development, recently highlighted that President Bola Tinubu, who once criticized former President Goodluck Jonathan for security failures, is now facing even greater challenges. This article explores the historical context, current realities, and potential solutions to Nigeria’s escalating security crisis.

Key Points

Background

The Chibok Abduction and Jonathan’s Administration

In April 2014, the abduction of 276 schoolgirls from Chibok, Borno State, by Boko Haram shocked the world. Then-President Goodluck Jonathan faced severe criticism for his administration’s slow response and inability to secure the girls’ release. Bola Tinubu, then an opposition figure, was among the vocal critics, accusing Jonathan of incompetence in handling Nigeria’s security challenges.

Buhari’s Presidency and Unmet Expectations

Muhammadu Buhari’s election in 2015 raised hopes due to his military background. Many Nigerians believed his experience would lead to a decisive victory against insurgents and armed groups. However, despite initial successes, such as the recapture of territories from Boko Haram, insecurity persisted. Banditry, kidnappings, and communal clashes continued to rise, revealing the complexity of Nigeria’s security issues.

Analysis

Comparing Security Performance: Jonathan vs. Tinubu

Professor Jibrin Ibrahim’s assertion that Tinubu’s administration is performing worse than Jonathan’s in terms of security is supported by several indicators:

• Increased Abductions: School kidnappings and mass abductions have surged, with armed groups targeting educational institutions and highways.
• Expansion of Armed Groups: Beyond Boko Haram, new armed factions have emerged, operating with near impunity in various regions.
• State Failure: The government’s inability to monopolize the use of force has led to a proliferation of armed non-state actors.

The Role of Impunity and Illegal Arms

The availability of illegal firearms and the lack of accountability for armed groups have emboldened criminals. Without effective law enforcement and judicial consequences, the cycle of violence continues unabated. This situation underscores the need for comprehensive disarmament programs and stronger legal frameworks.

Practical Advice

Government Strategies to Combat Insecurity

To address Nigeria’s security challenges, the following measures are recommended:

1. Strengthen Security Institutions: Invest in training, equipment, and intelligence-gathering capabilities for the military and police.
2. Community Engagement: Foster collaboration between security agencies and local communities to enhance trust and information-sharing.
3. Disarmament Programs: Implement voluntary and forced disarmament initiatives to reduce the circulation of illegal weapons.
4. Judicial Reforms: Ensure swift and fair trials for those involved in armed violence to deter future crimes.
5. Economic Development: Address root causes of insecurity, such as poverty and unemployment, through targeted economic policies.

Citizen Responsibilities

While the government bears the primary responsibility for security, citizens can contribute by:

• Reporting suspicious activities to authorities.
• Supporting community policing initiatives.
• Avoiding actions that could escalate tensions or violence.

FAQ

Conclusion

Nigeria’s insecurity crisis remains a pressing challenge that has persisted across multiple administrations. While President Tinubu’s criticism of Jonathan was valid, his own administration now faces even greater security threats. Addressing this issue requires a multifaceted approach, including institutional reforms, community engagement, and economic development. Without decisive action, the cycle of violence is likely to continue, further eroding public trust in the government’s ability to protect its citizens.