Ghana Interior Minister Blames Police and Armed Forces for 7 Deaths in 2020 and 2024 Election Clashes

Explore the official findings on Ghana election violence, security force accountability, and steps toward electoral peace in 2020 and 2024 polls.

Introduction

In a significant revelation on election security accountability, Ghana’s Minister for the Interior, Muntaka Mohammed Mubarak, has publicly attributed seven out of 15 recorded deaths during the 2020 and 2024 general elections to actions by police and armed forces. This disclosure came during a high-level briefing on November 4, 2025, detailing outcomes from a Special Investigation Task Force probe into electoral disturbances. As Ghana continues to strengthen its democratic processes, understanding the role of security personnel in maintaining order at polling stations and collation centers is crucial. This article breaks down the minister’s statements, the investigation process, and broader implications for Ghana election violence prevention and law enforcement responsibility.

Context of 2020 and 2024 Ghana Elections

Ghana’s 2020 presidential and parliamentary elections saw heightened tensions, with reports of clashes between supporters leading to casualties. The 2024 polls, held amid economic challenges and political rivalries, similarly experienced violent incidents at key voting sites. The Interior Minister’s update underscores the government’s commitment to transparency in addressing election-related deaths Ghana, highlighting how security interventions sometimes escalated situations.

Analysis

The minister’s briefing provides a detailed forensic-backed examination of the 15 fatalities linked to election periods. Of these, seven deaths were directly tied to security operations aimed at restoring calm. Specifically, armed police patrol teams were responsible for four deaths across three incidents, stemming from firearm use. Meanwhile, military personnel accounted for three deaths in separate interventions against chaotic crowds.

Breakdown of Security Force Involvement

According to Muntaka Mubarak, these tragic outcomes occurred during legitimate efforts to protect polling stations and collation centers—critical sites in Ghana’s electoral framework. The Special Investigation Task Force’s methodology included reviewing police case files, conducting forensic and ballistic examinations, and performing on-site visits. This rigorous approach ensured verifiable evidence, distinguishing security-attributable deaths from those arising purely from supporter confrontations.

Broader Patterns in Election Violence

While eight deaths were confirmed as resulting from political party supporter clashes without security involvement, the seven cases implicating police and military reveal systemic challenges in crowd control during high-stakes elections. This analysis aligns with Ghana’s Electoral Commission reports on past polls, emphasizing the need for de-escalation training for forces deployed in 2024 Ghana election clashes.

Summary

Ghana’s Interior Minister Muntaka Mohammed Mubarak announced that investigations into 2020 and 2024 election violence confirmed security forces’ role in seven fatalities out of 15 nationwide. Police firearms caused four deaths in three incidents, while military actions led to three more. A Special Task Force’s comprehensive report, based on police records, forensics, and site inspections, forms the basis of these findings. Cases involving security personnel will proceed through legal channels, promoting accountability in electoral security.

Key Points

Practical Advice

To mitigate future risks in Ghana elections, stakeholders can adopt evidence-based strategies drawn from this investigation. Voters and party supporters should prioritize peaceful conduct, adhering to Electoral Commission guidelines on polling day behavior.

For Security Forces

Police and military units benefit from non-lethal crowd control tools, such as rubber bullets or water cannons, as recommended by international standards from the UN Office on Drugs and Crime. Regular training in de-escalation, per Ghana Police Service protocols, reduces firearm reliance during election clashes Ghana.

For Political Parties and Voters

Party leaders must educate supporters on avoiding provocations. Community sensitization campaigns, like those run by the National Peace Council, have proven effective in past elections, lowering violence incidence by promoting dialogue over confrontation.

For Electoral Bodies

Enhance site security with early deployment of neutral monitors and real-time reporting apps to preempt clashes, building on lessons from 2020 and 2024 polls.

Points of Caution

Election periods demand vigilance to prevent escalations. Key cautions include:

• Avoid carrying weapons near polling areas, as per Ghana’s Public Order Act, which prohibits arms during elections.
• Security personnel must exercise proportional force, aligning with human rights standards from the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights.
• Supporters should report tensions via hotlines like the Electoral Commission’s 0800 toll-free line instead of self-policing.
• Misinformation on social media can incite violence; verify facts through official channels like the Interior Ministry.

These measures, grounded in Ghana’s legal framework, help safeguard democratic integrity amid 2020 Ghana election violence patterns.

Comparison

Comparing 2020 and 2024 election violence in Ghana reveals consistencies and evolutions. Both cycles recorded 15 total deaths, with security forces implicated in seven cases each time, per the Task Force’s dual-period probe. In 2020, clashes were prominent in urban hotspots like Greater Accra; 2024 saw similar distributions but with increased collation center incidents due to disputed tallies.

2020 vs. 2024: Security Response Metrics

This parity indicates persistent training gaps, despite post-2020 reforms like joint police-military drills announced by the Interior Ministry.

Legal Implications

The minister emphasized that security personnel involved in the seven deaths will face proceedings under Ghanaian law. Relevant statutes include the Criminal Offences Act (1960), which addresses culpable homicide and excessive force, and the Police Service Act (1970), mandating accountability for misuse of authority. Forensic evidence from ballistic tests strengthens prosecutorial cases, potentially leading to manslaughter charges. This aligns with constitutional provisions under Article 13 for the right to life, ensuring due process through the Attorney General’s office. Precedents from prior election probes, such as the 2016 Ayawaso West Wuogon by-election commission, demonstrate Ghana’s judicial commitment to electoral justice.

Conclusion

The Interior Minister’s disclosure on police and armed forces’ role in seven 2020 and 2024 election deaths marks a pivotal step toward accountability in Ghana’s democracy. By leveraging thorough investigations, the government reinforces trust in security institutions. Moving forward, enhanced training, legal adherence, and public education are essential to minimize election violence Ghana, fostering safer polls. This case exemplifies how transparency can transform tragedies into reforms, securing Ghana’s reputation as a stable African democracy.

FAQ