
Lands Ministry engages Ewoyaa chiefs, citizens in a hit lithium settlement talks
Introduction
The Ghanaian Lands Ministry recently convened a high‑level dialogue with the chiefs and citizens of Ewoyaa and neighbouring communities to discuss the lithium settlement that the federal government intends to implement. This engagement, which took place on 16 December 2025, marks a pivotal moment in Ghana’s strategic mineral agenda. By bringing together traditional authorities, local opinion leaders, and community members, the Ministry seeks to align the nation’s lithium development plan with the aspirations of the people who live atop the country’s promising Ewoyaa lithium deposit. The following article unpacks the key take‑aways, provides essential background, offers a critical analysis, and supplies practical advice for stakeholders who wish to navigate the evolving landscape of Ghana’s lithium sector.
Key Points
High‑level diplomatic apology and renewed commitment
Speaking on behalf of the Lands Minister Emmanuel Armah‑Kofi Buah, delegation chief Mahmoud Kabore issued a formal apology for the earlier withdrawal of the proposed settlement. He explained that the pause was intended to facilitate broader consultations, and reaffirmed the government’s dedication to finalising an innovative deal that benefits both Ewoyaa and the wider nation.
Stakeholder participation and community concerns
The meeting gathered chiefs from Ewoyaa and Krampah, local opinion leaders, and ordinary citizens. While the dialogue was welcomed, participants raised legitimate concerns about delays in parliamentary ratification. Some community members argued that the prolonged timeline is already adversely affecting livelihoods, especially those dependent on agriculture and small‑scale mining.
Government assurances and upcoming legislative steps
In response, Mahmoud Kabore assured the gathering that the government will honour its commitments and that the settlement will be laid before Parliament without further delay. Parallel assurances were offered by Ahmed Salim, General Manager of Atlantic Lithium, and Eric Stanley Acquah, Municipal Chief Executive of Mfantsiman, who highlighted that outstanding technical and financial issues will be resolved promptly.
Continuation of stakeholder‑centric processes
The engagement follows an earlier consultative session with civil‑society organisations on 15 December 2025. The Ministry has indicated that additional consultations will continue, aiming to refine the settlement before its resubmission to Parliament. This iterative approach underscores a broader policy shift towards inclusive decision‑making in Ghana’s strategic mineral development.
Background
Ghana’s lithium potential and the Ewoyaa project
Ghana’s lithium resources have attracted international attention over the past decade, particularly the Ewoyaa lithium deposit located in the Central Region. The deposit, estimated to contain several hundred million tonnes of high‑grade lithium spodumene, is being explored by Atlantic Lithium under a joint‑venture arrangement with the Ghanaian government. If developed, the project could position Ghana as a key supplier of battery‑grade lithium for the global electric‑vehicle market.
Legal and regulatory framework
The Mineral Act of 2016 (Act 703) governs mining activities in Ghana, establishing the Ministry of Lands and Natural Resources as the primary authority for granting licences, leases, and other regulatory approvals. Section 71 of the Act requires any mineral agreement that involves revenue sharing or community benefits to be ratified by Parliament before implementation. Consequently, the settlement under discussion must receive legislative endorsement to become legally binding.
Economic and social significance of the settlement
Beyond generating foreign exchange, the lithium settlement is expected to deliver a suite of community‑development benefits, including:
- Direct employment opportunities for local youth.
- Infrastructure upgrades such as road and power improvements.
- Revenue‑sharing mechanisms that fund education, health, and agricultural extension services.
These anticipated benefits explain why the Lands Ministry is treating the settlement as a strategic instrument for balancing national mineral ambitions with the welfare of host communities.
Analysis
Strategic implications for Ghana’s mineral sector
The ongoing negotiations reflect a broader trend in which African countries are seeking to capture a larger share of the value chain associated with critical minerals. By securing a robust settlement, Ghana can:
- Enhance fiscal revenues through royalties, corporate income tax, and profit‑sharing.
- Demonstrate a stable, investor‑friendly environment that may attract further exploration ventures.
- Strengthen its negotiating position in future agreements with multinational mining firms.
Community empowerment versus development risks
While the Ministry’s inclusive approach is commendable, the community’s concerns about parliamentary delays reveal a potential risk: prolonged uncertainty can erode trust and deter investment. Effective mitigation requires:
- Transparent communication about the legislative timeline.
- Timely disbursement of interim compensation packages.
- Concrete commitments to capacity‑building programmes for local entrepreneurs.
Legal considerations and compliance
From a legal standpoint, the settlement must comply with several statutory requirements:
- It must be consistent with the Mineral Act and any subsequent amendments.
- It must undergo parliamentary approval as mandated by Section 71.
- It should incorporate clear dispute‑resolution mechanisms to address any future disagreements between the state, the mining company, and the community.
Failure to meet these criteria could expose the government to litigation and international arbitration, jeopardising the project’s viability.
Practical Advice
For community leaders and citizens
Community representatives should:
- Maintain a documented record of all grievances and proposed solutions.
- Engage with independent legal counsel to monitor parliamentary proceedings.
- Leverage local media to keep the public informed about negotiation milestones.
For the Ministry of Lands and Natural Resources
The Ministry can accelerate the process by:
- Publishing a clear schedule for parliamentary ratification.
- Establishing an inter‑agency task force that includes representatives from the Ministry of Finance, the Attorney General’s Office, and the Ghana Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (GHEITI).
- Offering interim benefit‑sharing arrangements while the final settlement is under legislative review.
For investors such as Atlantic Lithium
Investors should:
- Provide regular updates to stakeholders about regulatory progress.
- Prepare contingency plans that address potential delays without compromising project timelines.
- Continue investing in community‑development projects to maintain social licence to operate.
For civil‑society organisations
CSOs can play a monitoring role by:
- Conducting independent impact assessments of the lithium project.
- Facilitating dialogue sessions between the government and affected communities.
- Advocating for transparency in the allocation of settlement revenues.
FAQ
What is the “lithium settlement” being discussed?
The term refers to a comprehensive agreement that outlines revenue‑sharing, community‑benefit provisions, and regulatory commitments associated with the exploitation of the Ewoyaa lithium deposit.
Who are the main parties involved?
The primary participants are the Lands Ministry, the chiefs and citizens of Ewoyaa and neighbouring communities, Atlantic Lithium, and other relevant governmental bodies such as the Municipal Chief Executive of Mfantsiman.
Why was the settlement initially withdrawn?
The withdrawal was a strategic pause announced by the Ministry to allow for broader stakeholder consultations, ensuring that the final agreement reflects the interests of all parties.
What is required for the settlement to become legally binding?
The settlement must be ratified by Parliament, as stipulated by Section 71 of the Mineral Act of 2016. Parliamentary approval confirms that the agreement complies with national law.
How will the settlement benefit the local communities?
Potential benefits include job creation, infrastructure development, revenue‑sharing for education and health services, and capacity‑building programmes aimed at empowering local entrepreneurs.
What are the risks of delaying parliamentary ratification?
Delays may lead to community unrest, loss of investor confidence, and the risk of legal challenges that could jeopardise the project’s financial viability.
Conclusion
The recent engagement between the Lands Ministry and the Ewoyaa chiefs and citizens underscores Ghana’s commitment to integrating strategic mineral development with community welfare. By apologising for the earlier withdrawal, reaffirming its dedication, and promising a swift parliamentary submission, the Ministry has signalled a proactive approach to resolving outstanding issues. Nevertheless, success hinges on transparent timelines, robust legal compliance, and sustained dialogue with all stakeholders. If these elements are effectively managed, the lithium settlement could become a model for how Ghana leverages its critical mineral resources to foster inclusive prosperity while maintaining its position as a competitive player in the global clean‑energy supply chain.
Sources
- Ministry of Lands and Natural Resources – Official Press Release, 16 December 2025.
- Atlantic Lithium Ltd. – Corporate Update, December 2025.
- Parliament of Ghana – Legislative Tracker, 2025.
- Ghana Mineral Act, 2016 (Act 703).
- Ghana Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (GHEITI) – Annual Report 2024/2025.
- Life Pulse Daily – “Lands Ministry engages Ewoyaa chiefs, citizens in a hit lithium settlement talks”, published 17 December 2025.
Leave a comment