LGBTQ Agenda Allegations: Analyzing Rev. Ntim Fordjour’s Claims on Ghana’s Constitutional Review

Article Title: LGBTQ time table being quietly inserted into constitutional overview – Ntim Fordjour claims – Life Pulse Daily

Introduction

In early 2026, a significant political controversy emerged regarding the ongoing constitutional review process in Ghana. Rev. John Ntim Fordjour, the Ranking Member of Parliament’s Defence and Interior Committee and a former Deputy Minister of Education, publicly accused the National Democratic Congress (NDC) of attempting to introduce LGBTQ provisions into Ghana’s Constitution and educational system. These allegations suggest a covert agenda aimed at imposing specific social policies on the Ghanaian populace through legislative and educational reforms. This article provides a comprehensive analysis of these claims, the context of the constitutional review, and the broader implications for Ghanaian society and governance.

Key Points

Background

To understand the gravity of Rev. Fordjour’s allegations, it is necessary to examine the political and social landscape of Ghana regarding LGBTQ rights and the constitutional review process.

The Constitutional Review Process

Ghana has been engaged in a comprehensive constitutional review process aimed at examining the 1992 Constitution. This process typically involves stakeholder consultations, committee hearings, and public submissions to identify potential amendments or additions to the nation’s supreme law. The goal is often to address gaps, modernize governance structures, and reflect contemporary societal values. However, constitutional reviews are inherently contentious, as they touch upon fundamental human rights, cultural values, and the balance of power.

Ghana’s Stance on LGBTQ Rights

Ghana’s legal and social environment regarding LGBTQ rights is restrictive. The Criminal Code of 1960 criminalizes “unnatural carnal knowledge,” which is often interpreted to prohibit same-sex relations. Furthermore, the “Promotion of Proper Human Sexual Rights and Ghanaian Family Values Bill 2021” (popularly known as the Anti-LGBTQ+ Bill) has been a subject of intense debate, aiming to criminalize LGBTQ advocacy and support. Against this backdrop, any perceived attempt to introduce LGBTQ provisions into the constitution or educational curriculum is met with significant resistance from conservative and religious groups.

Rev. John Ntim Fordjour’s Political Profile

Rev. John Ntim Fordjour is a prominent figure in Ghanaian politics, representing the Assin South constituency. As a Ranking Member of the Defence and Interior Committee, he holds a strategic position regarding national security and internal affairs. His background as a former Deputy Minister of Education adds weight to his comments on educational materials. As a clergyman, his views often resonate with religious demographics concerned with moral and family values.

Analysis

Rev. Fordjour’s claims center on two primary areas: the constitutional review process and the educational curriculum. Below is a detailed breakdown of his allegations and the context surrounding them.

Allegations of a “Diabolical” Constitutional Agenda

Rev. Fordjour described the alleged introduction of LGBTQ provisions as a “diabolical proposal” intended to be “pushed down the throat of Ghanaians.” This language suggests a lack of public consent and a hidden agenda. The constitutional review process is typically public, involving committee hearings and stakeholder submissions. Fordjour’s claim implies that specific proposals regarding LGBTQ rights are being introduced quietly, bypassing rigorous public scrutiny.

It is important to note that constitutional amendments in Ghana require a referendum or a supermajority in Parliament, depending on the nature of the amendment. Therefore, any attempt to alter the constitution regarding sensitive social issues would require extensive legislative maneuvering and public support.

Educational Curriculum Concerns

Perhaps the more specific allegation is the claim that LGBTQ concepts are being “smuggled” into teacher training manuals. Fordjour asserted that these materials advocate for “gender beyond the binary female and male,” including “diversity of sexual identity and expressions.”

This claim touches on the global debate over Comprehensive Sexuality Education (CSE). Proponents argue that CSE, which includes discussions on gender identity and sexual orientation, is essential for health and safety. Opponents, however, view it as an imposition of Western values that undermine local cultural and religious norms. If such materials were indeed introduced into Ghanaian teacher training without transparent approval processes, it would constitute a significant policy shift.

Political Context and the 2024 Elections

Rev. Fordjour accused the NDC of “fraudulently lying” to gain power by “weaponising LGBTQ propaganda.” This refers to the intense politicization of LGBTQ issues during the 2024 election cycle. In Ghana, political parties often align with conservative values to secure votes from religious and traditional demographics.

The accusation suggests that the NDC may have campaigned on a platform opposing the imposition of foreign values while secretly planning to introduce them once in office. This level of political mistrust is common in polarized environments but requires concrete evidence to substantiate claims of deliberate deception.

International Diplomacy: The UN Abstention

Fordjour linked the domestic allegations to Ghana’s recent abstention on a United Nations Human Rights Council vote related to LGBTQ issues. Abstentions in international diplomacy are often strategic; they allow a country to avoid taking a definitive stance that could alienate domestic constituents or international partners.

However, Fordjour interprets this abstention as a “precursor” to a “well-coordinated” effort to introduce these policies domestically. While international and domestic policies can be linked, an abstention is distinct from active support. Analyzing the specific UN resolution is necessary to understand the implications of Ghana’s vote. Typically, these resolutions focus on protection against violence and discrimination, which can be interpreted differently by various governments.

Practical Advice

For citizens, educators, and policymakers navigating these claims, it is crucial to approach the situation with diligence and verification. Here are practical steps to consider:

Verifying Information

Given the sensitivity of the topic, misinformation can spread rapidly. Citizens should seek primary sources regarding the constitutional review. This includes reviewing official reports from the Constitutional Review Commission or relevant parliamentary committees. Claims about educational materials should be verified by examining the actual manuals in question rather than relying solely on social media posts.

Engaging in Civic Discourse

Constitutional reviews are public processes. Citizens interested in influencing the outcome should attend town hall meetings, submit petitions to parliamentary committees, and engage with civil society organizations. Understanding the specific proposals being debated is essential for informed participation.

Understanding Legal Processes

It is helpful to understand the legal framework for changing the constitution or the national curriculum. In Ghana, changes to the constitution require rigorous procedures, often involving a referendum or a two-thirds majority in Parliament. Educational curricula typically undergo review by the Ghana Education Service (GES) and the Ministry of Education. Knowing these processes helps in assessing the feasibility of the alleged “covert” insertion of policies.

FAQ

Conclusion

Rev. John Ntim Fordjour’s allegations highlight a deep-seated tension between traditional values and evolving social policies in Ghana. His claims suggest a coordinated effort to introduce LGBTQ-related provisions into the Constitution and educational system through the ongoing review process. While these are serious accusations, they currently stand as allegations without verified public evidence of the specific constitutional clauses or educational manuals in question.

The situation underscores the importance of transparency in the constitutional review process and the need for public access to proposed changes. As Ghana continues to navigate these complex issues, the role of parliamentary oversight, media scrutiny, and public engagement will be critical in determining the nation’s legislative and educational trajectory. Citizens are advised to rely on verified sources and official documentation to form opinions on these matters.