
NaCCA Director-General Apologizes Over Controversial Teacher Guide: Key Insights and Implications
Published: January 14, 2026 | Updated: January 15, 2026
Introduction
The National Council for Curriculum and Assessment (NaCCA) in Ghana recently faced significant backlash over a controversial teacher guide that included content on gender identity. The guide, intended for Senior High School (SHS) educators, was withdrawn after public outrage, prompting an apology from NaCCA’s Director-General, Prof. Samuel Ofori Obuobisah Bekoe. This article examines the key events, the reasons behind the controversy, and the steps taken to address the issue.
Key Points
- Withdrawn Teacher Guide: NaCCA recalled a published instructor manual after concerns over its content on gender identity.
- Public Apology: Prof. Bekoe issued a formal apology, acknowledging the content’s inconsistency with Ghana’s cultural values.
- Revised Version: A new edition of the guide has been released, aligning with national values and biological definitions of gender.
- Ongoing Investigation: NaCCA is assessing the extent of the guide’s distribution and its impact on students.
Background
The Role of NaCCA in Ghana’s Education System
NaCCA is responsible for developing and reviewing Ghana’s school curricula. In 2024, it introduced a new SHS curriculum, supplemented by teacher guides to aid educators. The Physical Education and Health (Elective) Teacher Manual was part of this initiative but became a focal point of controversy.
Content That Sparked Outrage
The guide included sections on gender identity, a topic some Ghanaians deemed incompatible with the country’s cultural and religious values. Critics argued that the content could influence students in ways that contradicted traditional beliefs.
Public Reaction and Media Coverage
The controversy gained traction after media outlets, including Joy News, highlighted the issue. Parents and advocacy groups expressed concerns, leading to widespread calls for accountability.
Analysis
Why the Content Was Deemed Controversial
Ghana’s societal norms emphasize traditional gender roles, and discussions on gender identity are often met with resistance. The inclusion of such content in an official educational resource was seen as an overstep by many.
NaCCA’s Response and Accountability
Prof. Bekoe’s apology was a critical step in addressing public concerns. However, questions remain about how the content passed through NaCCA’s review processes. The Director-General attributed the oversight to systemic failures rather than intentional negligence.
Impact on Students and Educators
Since the guide was an elective resource, its reach was limited. However, the incident has raised broader questions about curriculum development and the need for stricter oversight to prevent similar issues in the future.
Practical Advice
For Parents and Guardians
- Stay informed about the curriculum and supplementary materials used in your child’s school.
- Engage with school administrators to express concerns or seek clarifications on educational content.
For Educators
- Review all teaching materials critically, ensuring alignment with national values and educational standards.
- Participate in training sessions to stay updated on curriculum changes and best practices.
For Policymakers
- Strengthen review processes to prevent controversial content from being published.
- Encourage public consultation when developing educational resources to ensure cultural sensitivity.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
What was the controversial content in the teacher guide?
The guide included discussions on gender identity, which some Ghanaians found incompatible with the country’s cultural values.
Why was the guide withdrawn?
NaCCA withdrew the guide after public outrage and concerns that the content did not reflect Ghana’s societal norms.
Has NaCCA issued an apology?
Yes, Prof. Samuel Ofori Obuobisah Bekoe, the Director-General of NaCCA, publicly apologized on behalf of the organization.
What steps is NaCCA taking to prevent future incidents?
NaCCA is reinforcing its review processes and has released a revised version of the guide that aligns with national values.
Conclusion
The NaCCA controversy highlights the challenges of balancing modern educational content with cultural expectations. While the withdrawal of the guide and the subsequent apology were necessary steps, the incident underscores the need for more rigorous oversight in curriculum development. Moving forward, transparency and public engagement will be crucial in maintaining trust in Ghana’s education system.
Leave a comment