NDC Silent on Anti-LGBT Legislation They Championed in Opposition—Afenyo Markin
Introduction
In the complex landscape of Ghanaian politics, legislative consistency is often scrutinized by the opposition and the electorate. A recent point of contention involves the proposed anti-LGBT legislation, a bill that saw intense debate during the previous administration. Minority Leader Alexander Afenyo-Markin has publicly criticized the governing National Democratic Congress (NDC) regarding their stance on this bill. He alleges that while the NDC aggressively campaigned for the legislation while in opposition, they have since adopted a posture of silence and procedural delay after assuming power. This article explores the background of the anti-LGBT bill, the specific allegations raised by the Minority Leader, and the broader implications for legislative integrity and political accountability in Ghana.
Key Points
- Accusation of Inconsistency: Minority Leader Alexander Afenyo-Markin claims the NDC has abandoned its previous support for the anti-LGBT legislation.
- Shift in Rhetoric: The NDC is accused of moving from aggressive campaigning for the bill to prioritizing “wider consultations” after taking office.
- Legislative Procedures: Afenyo-Markin alleges that the NDC used procedural technicalities to block a private member’s bill intended to advance the legislation.
- Educational Concerns: The Minority Leader raised alarms about the alleged introduction of sexual rights content in the national school curriculum.
- Political Motivation: The opposition views the NDC’s previous stance as a political tool used solely to gain electoral advantage.
Background
The Proposed Anti-LGBT Legislation
The proposed anti-LGBT bill in Ghana, often referred to by various names including the “Promotion of Proper Human Sexual Rights and Ghanaian Family Values Bill,” has been a subject of intense national discourse. The bill seeks to criminalize LGBTQ+ activities and advocacy, citing the protection of Ghanaian cultural and religious values as its primary objective. While the bill has garnered support from various religious groups and traditional leaders, it has also faced significant opposition from human rights organizations and international stakeholders.
Political Dynamics Pre-2024
During the tenure of the previous administration (under the New Patriotic Party, NPP), the anti-LGBT bill was a focal point of legislative debate. At that time, the National Democratic Congress (NDC) was in opposition. Historical records indicate that the NDC minority in Parliament frequently vocalized support for the bill, aligning themselves with the cultural and moral arguments presented by proponents. This period was characterized by public rallies, media engagements, and lobbying efforts by the NDC to ensure the bill’s passage.
Analysis
Allegations of Political Opportunism
Minority Leader Afenyo-Markin’s critique centers on the concept of political opportunism. He argues that the NDC’s aggressive promotion of the anti-LGBT legislation while in opposition was a calculated strategy to appeal to a conservative voter base. By championing the bill, the NDC sought to secure the support of religious bodies and traditional rulers. However, Afenyo-Markin contends that once the party secured power, the urgency to enact this legislation evaporated, suggesting that the moral arguments previously presented were secondary to political expediency.
Procedural Hurdles and Legislative Gridlock
One of the specific grievances raised by the Minority Leader involves the legislative process itself. He alleges that when the NDC was in opposition, they supported the swift passage of the bill. However, upon assuming government, they have cited the need for “wider consultations.” Afenyo-Markin highlights a specific incident where the Minority introduced a private member’s bill to push the legislation forward. He claims the NDC government utilized procedural objections—specifically regarding the Speaker’s approval—to stall the process, a move he views as a deliberate obstruction of their own previously held principles.
Contradiction in Government Communication
The analysis of the government’s communication reveals a perceived contradiction. President John Dramani Mahama’s administration has reportedly indicated that they are reviewing the bill to ensure it is well-formulated. Afenyo-Markin questions this stance, asking why further formulation is necessary for a bill the NDC previously claimed was ready for immediate passage. This shift from “pass it now” to “let’s consult further” forms the core of the opposition’s criticism regarding policy consistency.
Educational Curriculum Controversy
Beyond the legislative sphere, Afenyo-Markin extended his critique to the educational sector. He alleged that the government introduced content promoting sexual rights into the national curriculum. According to his statements, when this was exposed by the Minority, government officials labeled the inclusion as an “error” or “anomaly.” This incident is cited as evidence of a hidden agenda that contradicts the government’s public silence on the anti-LGBT bill. The verification of such curriculum changes remains a point of interest for educational stakeholders and parents.
Practical Advice
For Political Observers and Citizens
Understanding the nuances of legislative promises requires diligent research. Citizens interested in the anti-LGBT legislation should:
- Review Parliamentary Records: Check the Hansard (official parliamentary reports) to verify how specific MPs voted or spoke regarding the bill in the past versus the present.
- Follow Committee Proceedings: The bill likely resides in a parliamentary committee. Monitoring these meetings provides insight into the actual progress and government stance.
- Seek Balanced Reporting: Rely on multiple news sources to understand the context of the “wider consultations” mentioned by the government.
For Legislative Actors
To maintain public trust, political parties should aim for policy consistency. If a shift in strategy regarding a bill like the anti-LGBT legislation occurs, clear communication regarding the reasons for the shift (e.g., legal advice, international relations) is essential rather than relying on procedural delays that may appear obstructive.
FAQ
What is the current status of the anti-LGBT bill in Ghana?
As of the latest reports, the bill remains under consideration. While it has passed the consideration stage in some readings, it has not yet been enacted into law. The government has indicated a need for broader consultations to ensure the legislation aligns with constitutional provisions and international obligations.
Why is the NDC accused of silence on the bill?
Minority Leader Afenyo-Markin accuses the NDC of silence because, despite having championed the bill aggressively while in opposition, the current government has not prioritized its passage. Instead, officials have emphasized the need for further dialogue and formulation.
Does the anti-LGBT bill have bipartisan support?
Historically, the bill enjoyed significant support across both major political parties (NPP and NDC) in Parliament, largely due to cultural and religious sentiments. However, the level of active advocacy has varied depending on which party is in power.
What are the legal implications of the bill?
If enacted, the bill would impose stricter penalties on LGBTQ+ activities and advocacy. It has drawn criticism from international human rights organizations and potential trade partners regarding freedom of expression and human rights protections.
Conclusion
The allegations made by Minority Leader Alexander Afenyo-Markin highlight a critical tension in Ghanaian governance: the gap between political rhetoric and legislative action. By accusing the NDC of using the anti-LGBT legislation as a political tool to gain power and subsequently abandoning it, the opposition challenges the governing party’s integrity. Whether viewed as a necessary period of consultation or a betrayal of campaign promises, the silence surrounding the bill marks a significant shift in the legislative landscape. As the debate continues, transparency and adherence to stated principles remain paramount for both the NDC and the NPP.
Sources
- Life Pulse Daily. (2026). NDC silent on Anti-LGBT legislation they championed in opposition—Afenyo Markin.
- Parliament of Ghana. (2024-2025). Debates on the Promotion of Proper Human Sexual Rights and Ghanaian Family Values Bill.
- Graphic Online. (Various Dates). Reports on the Anti-LGBTQ+ Bill and Government Stance.
- Minority Press Conference Transcript. (January 26, 2026). Statements by Alexander Afenyo-Markin.
Leave a comment