No MP is untouchable, says Inusah Fuseini as Afenyo-Markin faces privileges probe – Life Pulse Daily

Introduction

Ghana’s Parliament Faces Accountability Test

Former Tamale Central MP Inusah Fuseini has issued a stark warning to Ghanaian legislators: no member of parliament (MP) is above scrutiny. His remarks follow the referral of Minority Leader Alexander Afenyo-Markin to the Privileges Committee over alleged contempt of parliamentary conduct. This case underscores the critical importance of adherence to Ghana’s parliamentary rules, known as the Standing Orders, and highlights the broader theme of legislative accountability in democratic governance.

Analysis

The Afenyo-Markin Referral: What Happened?

Speaker Alban Bagbin referred Afenyo-Markin to the Privileges Committee after Majority Leader Mahama Ayariga filed a petition. The dispute arose when Afenyo-Markin challenged a decision to exclude him from Ghana’s ECOWAS delegation—a move he deemed procedurally irregular. The referral now places Afenyo-Markin’s conduct under formal review, with potential disciplinary consequences.

Inusah Fuseini’s Warning: Key Takeaways

Speaking on Citi Eyewitness News, Fuseini emphasized that MPs must prioritize compliance with parliamentary rules. He stressed that ignorance of the Standing Orders is no defense and urged legislators to familiarize themselves with protocols governing debates, motions, and disciplinary procedures. Fuseini also noted that leadership roles—whether Majority or Minority Leader—do not grant immunity from sanctions.

The Role of Ghana’s Privileges Committee

The Privileges Committee investigates alleged breaches of parliamentary conduct, including contempt, misconduct, or violations of the Standing Orders. Its findings can lead to penalties ranging from reprimands to suspension or expulsion, as outlined in Article 97 of Ghana’s Constitution.

Summary

Inusah Fuseini’s comments reflect growing tensions in Ghana’s Parliament over accountability and procedural compliance. The Afenyo-Markin probe serves as a reminder that even high-ranking MPs face consequences for rule violations. This case reinforces the principle that parliamentary privileges come with responsibilities—a cornerstone of democratic integrity.

Key Points

Practical Advice

For MPs: How to Avoid Privileges Committee Referrals

MPs can minimize disciplinary risks by:

• Studying the Standing Orders to understand procedural requirements.
• Consulting parliamentary clerks for clarifications during debates.
• Avoiding inflammatory language or personal attacks during sessions.
• Respecting rulings from the Speaker without public challenges.

Points of Caution

Risks of Non-Compliance

Failure to adhere to parliamentary rules can lead to:

• Formal reprimands or suspensions.
• Loss of committee assignments or leadership roles.
• Expulsion under Article 97 for severe breaches.

Comparison

Past Cases of Parliamentary Discipline in Ghana

Similar cases include:

• 2022: Two MPs suspended for bribery allegations.
• 2019: A Minority MP reprimanded for disrupting proceedings.
• 2017: An NDC MP faced expulsion threats over absenteeism.

These precedents show that Ghana’s Parliament consistently enforces its rules.

Legal Implications

Constitutional Framework for Disciplinary Action

Article 97 of Ghana’s Constitution empowers Parliament to discipline members for misconduct. Expulsion requires a two-thirds majority vote, ensuring checks against arbitrary decisions. Affected MPs may also seek judicial review under Ghana’s 1992 Constitution.

Conclusion

Inusah Fuseini’s warning and the Afenyo-Markin probe highlight the non-partisan nature of parliamentary accountability. As Ghana’s democracy matures, adherence to procedural rules remains vital for public trust and institutional credibility.

FAQ