Corporate chief Yaw Nsarkoh has criticised Ghana’s political progress, describing the rustic as a “palanquin economy” the place the various raise the few, and caution that neither the NPP nor the NDC merits reward for the present state of nationwide asset allocation.

Speaking because the keynote speaker on the Quality Week Celebration of the Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research on Monday, February 23, 2026, on the University of Ghana, Legon, Mr Nsarkoh painted a grim image of Ghana’s social and financial demanding situations, subsidized by way of statistical proof.

He mentioned Ghana’s asset allocation results stay vulnerable in spite of many years of political transitions between the New Patriotic Party and the National Democratic Congress.

“Politicians are constantly squabbling about who should get the credit — between NPP and NDC — for some supposed great current state of affairs. It is not always clear to me which one exactly,” he mentioned.

According to him, handiest about 3.8 in line with cent of Ghana’s inhabitants is above 65 years, a ways underneath ranges in similar middle-income nations. He argued that this displays deficient well being and residing prerequisites that save you many voters from taking part in lengthy and productive lives.

Mr Nsarkoh additionally famous that about 65 in line with cent of adults can not manage to pay for ok diet, just about 20 in line with cent are living in excessive poverty, and open defecation stays standard in lots of communities.

“These figures tell a very disturbing story about how we are failing large sections of our people,” he noticed.

On environmental degradation, he described unlawful mining, popularly referred to as galamsey, as a significant nationwide risk, accusing successive governments of failing to behave decisively.

“Party come, party go — with assured impunity. Despite all the loud rhetoric, we have not made enough progress on this matter,” he mentioned.

Using the metaphor of a “palanquin economy,” Mr Nsarkoh mentioned Ghana’s device rewards a small elite on the expense of the bulk. He referenced Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz to argue that inequality harms each the wealthy and the deficient.

“The 1 per cent must care about the 99 per cent — not out of charity, but out of necessity. A society built on ‘me only’ cannot endure,” he wired.

He additionally challenged researchers on the institute to behave as “organic intellectuals,” drawing at the concepts of Italian thinker Antonio Gramsci, and recommended them to make use of science to persuade public coverage.

“It will be such a shame if you collapse into an elite group of intellectually incestuous academics that contributes nothing original to knowledge,” he warned.

The tournament, which shaped a part of NMIMR’s annual Quality Week actions, introduced in combination scientists, policymakers, and lecturers to talk about well being, setting, and asset allocation.

It was once chaired by way of Alfred Yawson, Provost of the College of Health Sciences, and hosted by way of NMIMR Director Dorothy Yeboah-Manu. The Guest of Honour was once Emmanuel Armah Kofi Buah, Minister for Lands and Natural Resources.

DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by way of Readers and Contributors in this platform don’t essentially constitute the perspectives or coverage of Multimedia Group Limited.

DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by way of Readers and Contributors in this platform don’t essentially constitute the perspectives or coverage of Multimedia Group Limited.