Number 12: ‘Anas is a conman and investigative terrorist, peddling falsehoods’ – Nyantakyi fires again
Life Pulse Daily | January 15, 2026
Introduction
The long-standing feud between former Ghana Football Association (GFA) President Kwesi Nyantakyi and investigative journalist Anas Aremeyaw Anas has escalated dramatically. In an in depth and scathing rebuttal dated January 14, 2026, Nyantakyi has categorised the CEO of Tiger Eye PI as a “conman and investigative terrorist.” This newest alternate stems from a JoyNews interview and next statements in regards to the debatable “Number 12” exposé. Nyantakyi’s 14-point reaction goals to dismantle what he phrases “planned falsehoods” propagated by means of Tiger Eye PI, particularly addressing claims in regards to the withdrawal of fees, alleged threats, and the character of the criminal battles between the 2 events.
Key Points
- Strong Accusations: Kwesi Nyantakyi describes Anas Aremeyaw Anas as a “conman and investigative terrorist.”
- Legal Dispute: Nyantakyi refutes claims that the Attorney General withdrew fees, mentioning the High Court struck out fees because of a loss of witnesses.
- Rejection of “Number 12”: The former GFA boss dismisses the investigative piece as a “cut-and-paste sham.”
- Denial of Threats: Nyantakyi flatly denies ever threatening Anas or his buddies.
- Civil vs. Criminal Cases: He clarifies that whilst the legal case is energetic, civil circumstances in opposition to Anas also are ongoing.
Background
The warfare between Kwesi Nyantakyi and Anas Aremeyaw Anas dates again to the 2018 premiere of the investigative documentary “Number 12,” which uncovered corruption in Ghanaian soccer. The fallout ended in Nyantakyi’s resignation as GFA President and a ban from football-related actions by means of the Confederation of African Football (CAF) and FIFA.
The “Number 12” Exposé
“Number 12” was once a documentary geared toward rooting out corruption in soccer organization. It applied hidden cameras to seize interactions involving Nyantakyi and different officers. Nyantakyi has constantly maintained that the photos was once edited and misrepresented, regarding it as a “cut-and-paste sham.”
Recent Context
The newest flare-up started after Nyantakyi gave an interview on JoyNews on January 6, 2026. Tiger Eye PI due to this fact issued a 10-point remark responding to his feedback. Nyantakyi argues that Tiger Eye PI is a “busybody” within the legal case introduced by means of the Republic in opposition to him and that their remark was once designed to deceive the general public.
Analysis
Nyantakyi’s January 14, 2026, remark is a complete try to reclaim the narrative. By attacking the credibility of Anas and the method of the “Number 12” investigation, Nyantakyi seeks to painting himself as a sufferer of a smear marketing campaign fairly than a corrupt legitimate.
The “Investigative Terrorist” Label
The use of the time period “investigative terrorist” is an important escalation in rhetoric. It means that Nyantakyi perspectives Anas’s strategies now not as journalism, however as a type of extrajudicial coercion. Nyantakyi argues {that a} “guy of integrity” would now not “peddle falsehoods” and that Anas’s refusal to testify in court docket (or be pressured to take action) suggests he acts above the legislation.
Legal Semantics: Withdrawal vs. Striking Out
A core level of competition is the standing of the legal case. Tiger Eye PI claimed fees have been withdrawn; Nyantakyi insists this can be a lie. Legally, there’s a distinct distinction between the Attorney General chickening out fees and a High Court putting them out because of the prosecution’s failure to offer proof or witnesses. Nyantakyi asserts the latter passed off for the reason that Republic, together with Anas as a possible witness, didn’t prosecute successfully.
Separation of Criminal and Civil Matters
Nyantakyi clarifies that his public feedback in regards to the legal case don’t negate the lifestyles of civil defamation fits he has filed in opposition to Anas. This difference is an important; he’s preventing a multi-front battle: protecting in opposition to legal fees (which he claims are procedurally wrong) and attacking Anas’s recognition in civil court docket.
Practical Advice
For readers following high-profile criminal battles involving investigative journalism and public corruption, it is very important to know the nuances of the Ghanaian criminal gadget.
Understanding Legal Terminology
When following information about court docket circumstances, distinguish between:
- Withdrawal of Charges: A call by means of the prosecution (the State) to forestall pursuing the case.
- Striking Out: A call by means of the Judge to take away the case from the court docket roll, ceaselessly because of state of no activity or procedural failure by means of the prosecution.
- Discharge: When a defendant is officially cleared of the costs.
Nyantakyi’s argument hinges on the truth that the case was once struck out, now not that he was once acquitted or that fees have been voluntarily withdrawn.
Assessing Investigative Reports
When eating investigative journalism:
- Look for corroboration of details.
- Understand the method used (e.g., hidden cameras vs. documentary proof).
- Review criminal responses from the topics of the investigation.
- Be conscious that “Number 12” ended in FIFA bans and GFA restructuring, indicating that the multinational soccer governing our bodies accredited the findings, without reference to the precise criminal results relating to Nyantakyi’s private prosecution.
FAQ
Who is Anas Aremeyaw Anas?
Anas Aremeyaw Anas is a Ghanaian investigative journalist and CEO of Tiger Eye PI. He is understood for his undercover paintings exposing corruption and crime, ceaselessly the usage of hidden cameras. He assists in keeping his id hidden to offer protection to his protection.
What is the “Number 12” documentary?
“Number 12” is a 2018 investigative documentary by means of Anas that fascinated with corruption in African soccer, particularly implicating Kwesi Nyantakyi and different officers.
Did the costs in opposition to Kwesi Nyantakyi get withdrawn?
According to Kwesi Nyantakyi, the costs weren’t withdrawn by means of the Attorney General. Instead, the High Court struck out the costs two times for the reason that Republic failed to offer witnesses to prosecute the case.
Is Anas Aremeyaw Anas required to testify in court docket?
Nyantakyi argues that Anas, as a key determine within the allegations, must testify. He claims the Republic may have pressured Anas to testify by way of a subpoena however failed to take action, resulting in the case being struck out.
What is the present dating between Nyantakyi and Anas?
They are engaged in ongoing criminal and public disputes. Nyantakyi has filed civil defamation circumstances in opposition to Anas whilst concurrently protecting in opposition to the remnants of the legal prosecution initiated by means of the state.
Conclusion
Kwesi Nyantakyi’s forceful reaction to Tiger Eye PI highlights the deep divisions last from the “Number 12” scandal. By accusing Anas Aremeyaw Anas of being a “conman” and a “terrorist,” Nyantakyi is trying to discredit the investigative strategies used in opposition to him. The core of the dispute stays the criminal classification of the case’s dismissal and the veracity of the claims made within the documentary. As of January 2026, the combat for recognition and criminal vindication continues, with each side firmly entrenched of their positions.
Leave a comment