Primate Ayodele Calls for Tinubu Resignation Over Nigeria Insecurity Crisis: Killings and Kidnappings Surge

Discover why Primate Elijah Ayodele, leader of INRI Evangelical Spiritual Church, urges President Bola Tinubu to step down amid escalating violence in Nigeria. This guide breaks down the statement, its context, and implications for national security.

Introduction

Nigeria’s insecurity crisis has reached alarming levels, with frequent reports of killings and kidnappings plaguing communities across the country. In a bold statement, Primate Elijah Ayodele, the spiritual leader of INRI Evangelical Spiritual Church, directly challenged President Bola Tinubu to resign if he cannot protect Nigerian lives. Delivered through his media aide, Osho Oluwatosin, this call highlights the growing frustration over government handling of security threats.

The prophet’s remarks come at a time when Nigeria faces widespread banditry, herder-farmer clashes, and insurgent activities, affecting people regardless of religion or ethnicity. Ayodele’s message emphasizes the president’s core duty: ensuring safety for all citizens. This article provides a pedagogical breakdown of the statement, offering clear insights into Nigeria’s insecurity challenges, key criticisms, and proposed solutions to educate readers on this pressing issue.

Context of Rising Insecurity in Nigeria

Nigeria has grappled with insecurity for years, including high-profile kidnappings in the northwest and killings in the Middle Belt. Recent surges have eroded public trust, prompting vocal critiques from religious leaders like Primate Ayodele, known for his prophetic declarations on national matters.

Analysis

Primate Ayodele’s critique dissects multiple facets of Nigeria’s insecurity crisis under President Tinubu’s administration. He labels the situation a “disgrace,” particularly noting government officials’ trip to the United States to address concerns raised by former President Donald Trump about instability. This juxtaposition underscores perceived priorities: international image management over domestic safety.

Central to his analysis is the universal impact of violence—what he terms “genocide”—striking Christians, Muslims, and others alike. Ayodele argues that Tinubu’s failure to safeguard lives erodes confidence, positioning resignation as a logical step if competence is lacking. He extends criticism to National Security Adviser (NSA) Nuhu Ribadu, accusing him of ignoring warnings that could save lives.

Breakdown of Key Criticisms

• Presidential Accountability: Tinubu must use all resources to protect citizens, transcending tribal or religious lines.
• NSA’s Role: Ribadu’s dismissal of intelligence advice hampers security efforts.
• Public Confidence: Ongoing killings signal leadership inadequacy.

This analysis reveals a prophetic perspective rooted in moral and practical governance, urging immediate action amid verifiable spikes in incidents reported by credible outlets.

Summary

In summary, Primate Elijah Ayodele demands President Bola Tinubu’s resignation if insecurity—marked by rampant killings and kidnappings—persists. He condemns the government’s response, highlights NSA Nuhu Ribadu’s shortcomings, and advocates for proactive measures like deploying air forces and relocating security chiefs. Published on November 21, 2025, via Daily Post Nigeria, the statement calls for unity in tackling threats affecting all Nigerians.

Key Points

Practical Advice

Primate Ayodele offers actionable recommendations to address Nigeria’s insecurity crisis, providing a blueprint for enhanced security operations. These suggestions are pedagogical, teaching how coordinated efforts can mitigate threats.

Security Deployment Strategies

• Air Force Utilization: Deploy aircraft in troubled areas, similar to election monitoring flights, for surveillance and rapid response.
• Relocation of Leadership: Inspector General of Police (IGP) and Chief of Army Staff (COAS) should base themselves in high-risk zones.
• Support for DSS: State Security Service (DSS) officers are proactive; bolster them with other forces to act on intelligence.
• Comprehensive Action: Use all powers to protect lives, ensuring no advice—prophetic or otherwise—is ignored.

Implementing these could disrupt terrorist operations, as Ayodele notes perpetrators are “not spirits” but vulnerable humans. This advice aligns with standard counter-insurgency tactics verified in security studies.

Points of Caution

Ayodele issues stern warnings to prevent further escalation of Nigeria’s insecurity. These serve as educational red flags for policymakers and citizens.

Specific Warnings Issued

• To President Tinubu: Act decisively or risk total loss of public confidence; disarray follows unchecked insecurity.
• To NSA Nuhu Ribadu: Stop ignoring warnings; hold him accountable for the sake of innocent Nigerians, not politics.
• General Alert: Terrorists show no mercy—destroy them proactively; disregard prophecies at peril.

These cautions highlight the human cost, with verifiable data from sources like the Nigeria Security Tracker showing thousands affected yearly.

Comparison

Primate Ayodele’s statement draws implicit comparisons to highlight inconsistencies in Nigeria’s security approach.

Government Priorities: US Trip vs. Domestic Action

Officials traveled to the US amid Trump’s threats on instability, yet domestic killings continue unchecked—a contrast to urgent internal needs.

Election Security vs. Everyday Protection

Airplanes patrol during elections for VIP safety, but not in banditry hotspots. Ayodele urges similar vigilance daily.

Historical Context

Under previous administrations, prophets like Ayodele issued similar warnings on Boko Haram and banditry, often unheeded until crises peaked, per archived statements.

This comparative lens educates on resource allocation failures contributing to the ongoing Nigeria insecurity crisis.

Legal Implications

Primate Ayodele’s call for resignation carries no direct legal weight, as it constitutes protected free speech under Nigeria’s 1999 Constitution (Section 39), which safeguards opinion expression. No laws mandate resignation based on prophetic advice or public criticism.

However, it underscores accountability under the Nigerian Police Act and Armed Forces Act, where security chiefs must act on intelligence. Ignoring warnings could invite judicial reviews in cases of negligence, as seen in past human rights litigations by groups like the Nigerian Bar Association. Tinubu’s administration remains legally bound by oath to protect lives (1999 Constitution, Section 14(2)(b)). This statement prompts discourse without enforceable legal action.

Conclusion

Primate Elijah Ayodele’s demand for President Tinubu’s resignation amid Nigeria’s surging killings and kidnappings encapsulates a profound call for leadership renewal. By critiquing NSA Nuhu Ribadu, urging air deployments, and emphasizing universal protection, he offers a roadmap out of the insecurity crisis. Nigerians deserve safety; this prophetic voice reminds all of that imperative. As debates intensify, focused action on practical advice could restore confidence and curb violence.

For ongoing updates on Nigeria insecurity, kidnappings in Nigeria, and related developments, stay informed through verified sources.

FAQ