Seven Additional Nations Agree to Enroll in Trump’s Board of Peace

By Life Pulse Daily | Published: January 21, 2026

Introduction

The geopolitical landscape is shifting as seven additional nations have formally agreed to enroll in the “Board of Peace,” a new international framework proposed by former U.S. President Donald Trump. This initiative, originally conceived to address the conflict in Gaza, is rapidly expanding into a broader global mechanism. With key Middle Eastern powers such as Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Egypt joining the fold, alongside existing members like Israel, the Board is positioning itself as a potential alternative to traditional United Nations peacekeeping efforts.

This article provides a comprehensive analysis of the Board of Peace, exploring its proposed charter, the implications of new membership, and the complex challenges surrounding the ongoing Gaza ceasefire. We will examine the reactions from world leaders, including Vladimir Putin and Benjamin Netanyahu, and offer practical insights into what this new diplomatic structure means for international relations.

Key Points

Background

The Board of Peace was initially introduced as a mechanism to resolve the two-year conflict between Israel and Hamas in Gaza. However, its scope appears to have broadened significantly. The initiative aims to supplant or supplement existing UN frameworks, proposing a new method of international mediation led by the United States.

Origins of the Initiative

The conflict in Gaza, triggered by the Hamas-led attack on October 7, 2023, resulted in the loss of approximately 1,200 Israeli lives and the abduction of 251 individuals. In response, Israel launched a military campaign that the Hamas-run Gaza Health Ministry reports has resulted in over 71,550 Palestinian deaths. The Board of Peace was designed to navigate the aftermath of this devastation, focusing on ceasefire consolidation and reconstruction.

Current Conflict Status

The conflict remains in a fragile state. Phase One of the peace asset allocation established a ceasefire, an exchange of living hostages and deceased captives for Palestinian prisoners, and a partial Israeli withdrawal accompanied by increased humanitarian aid. Phase Two, however, faces significant hurdles. Hamas has historically refused to disarm without the establishment of an independent Palestinian state, while Israel has not committed to a full withdrawal from Gaza. Despite the ceasefire, humanitarian conditions remain dire, with over 460 Palestinians reported killed in Israeli strikes since the truce began.

Key Points: New Members and Global Participation

The recent announcement confirms that seven major nations are joining the Board of Peace. This expansion significantly alters the composition of the body, introducing a strong Muslim-majority bloc alongside Western and Israeli representatives.

The Muslim-Majority Coalition

The group of seven nations—Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Egypt, Jordan, Indonesia, Pakistan, and Qatar—has collectively endorsed the Board’s objectives. According to their joint statement, they support the consolidation of a permanent ceasefire in Gaza and the advancement of what they term “just and lasting peace.” Their involvement is critical for legitimacy in the Middle East, given their regional influence and historical roles in mediation.

Invitations and Responses

While the UAE, Bahrain, Albania, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Hungary, Kazakhstan, Morocco, and Vietnam have already signed up, other major powers are still deliberating:

• Russia: President Vladimir Putin confirmed he is considering the invitation and expressed willingness to contribute $1 billion from frozen Russian assets. He views the Board as primarily relevant to the Middle East.
• The Vatican: Pope Leo has received an invitation. Cardinal Pietro Parolin, the Vatican’s Secretary of State, indicated the Pope needs time to consider participation.
• Slovenia: Prime Minister Robert Golob declined the invitation, stating the frame “dangerously interferes with the wider worldwide order.”
• Canada and the UK: These nations have been invited but have not yet publicly confirmed their participation.

Analysis: Governance, Charter, and Controversies

The Board of Peace is structured as a distinct international organization. A leaked document regarding its charter reveals a unique governance model that centralizes significant authority, raising questions about international law and sovereignty.

Charter and Authority

The Board’s constitution is designed to enter into force once three states officially agree to be bound by it. Key features include:

• Leadership: Donald Trump serves as Chairman and simultaneously as the U.S. representative.
• Executive Power: The Chairman holds the authority to nominate executive board members and create or dissolve subsidiary bodies.
• Membership Terms: Member states are granted renewable three-year terms. Permanent seats are available to nations contributing $1 billion (approximately £740 million).

This financial requirement for permanent seats distinguishes the Board from traditional UN bodies, where membership is generally not contingent on direct financial contributions for voting rights.

Executive Board Composition

The White House recently named seven founding Executive Board members, including U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff, Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner, and former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair. This mix of current officials and private citizens suggests a hybrid public-private diplomatic approach.

Israel’s Opposition

A significant point of friction has emerged regarding the governance of Gaza’s reconstruction. Netanyahu’s office stated that the composition of the Gaza Executive Board was “not coordinated with Israel and runs opposite to its coverage.” Israeli media reported that the decision to include Turkey and Qatar—nations that helped broker the October ceasefire—was made “over Israel’s head.” This highlights a potential rift between Israel and the broader coalition.

Role of the UN Security Council

Despite the Board’s ambition to supplant UN purposes, its operations in Gaza are currently authorized by a UN Security Council resolution valid until the end of 2027. Former UN Middle East envoy Nickolay Mladenov has been appointed as the Board’s representative in Gaza, tasked with overseeing the second phase of asset allocation, which includes reconstruction and demilitarization.

Practical Advice: Understanding the Implications

For observers, investors, and policy watchers, the Board of Peace represents a shift in how international peace processes may be funded and managed in the future.

For International Observers

Monitor the “three-state ratification” threshold. Once the Board’s constitution enters into force, it will establish a legal precedent for private or semi-private international organizations managing post-conflict reconstruction. Watch for the specific legal frameworks the Board adopts versus traditional international law.

For Humanitarian Watchers

Focus on the transition from Phase One to Phase Two of the Gaza peace plan. The success of the Board depends on resolving the core disputes: Hamas’s disarmament and Israel’s withdrawal. The inclusion of Qatar and Turkey may facilitate dialogue with Hamas, but it complicates relations with Israel.

Financial Implications

The $1 billion entry fee for permanent seats creates a tiered membership structure. This could influence the Board’s decision-making, potentially prioritizing the interests of wealthy contributors. Investors should watch for specific reconstruction contracts and funding flows through the Board’s subsidiary bodies.

FAQ: Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Board of Peace?

The Board of Peace is an international framework proposed by Donald Trump designed to manage peace-building efforts, initially focused on the Gaza conflict, but with a growing global membership.

Which nations are currently members?

Confirmed members include Israel, the UAE, Bahrain, Albania, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Hungary, Kazakhstan, Morocco, Vietnam, and the newly added Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Egypt, Jordan, Indonesia, Pakistan, and Qatar.

How does the Board differ from the UN?

While authorized by a UN resolution for its Gaza operations, the Board is structured as a separate entity. It features a Chairman with significant executive power (Donald Trump) and requires financial contributions for permanent seats, unlike the UN’s state-based voting system.

Has Russia joined?

As of the latest reports, Russia has not formally joined. President Putin stated he is considering the invitation and has offered financial support but has not confirmed membership.

What is the status of the Gaza ceasefire?

A ceasefire is currently in effect (Phase One), involving hostage exchanges and aid delivery. However, Phase Two, which involves demilitarization and full withdrawal, faces significant obstacles and violence continues sporadically.

Conclusion

The enrollment of seven additional nations in Trump’s Board of Peace marks a pivotal moment in international diplomacy. By creating a parallel structure to the UN with a focus on financial contributions and centralized leadership, the Board challenges traditional multilateral norms. While the inclusion of key Muslim-majority nations offers hope for a consolidated peace in Gaza, internal disagreements—particularly with Israel—and questions regarding the Board’s legal authority remain significant hurdles. As the Board moves toward ratification, the world watches to see if this new model can deliver the “just and lasting peace” it promises.