The Speaker of Parliament, Alban Bagbin, has officially apologised to the Judiciary for the heated exchanges that marred the vetting of Chief Justice nominee, Justice Paul Baffoe-Bonnie, the day before today.

In an extraordinary transfer to defuse institutional pressure, Mr. Bagbin expressed deep be apologetic about and issued a stern warning to legislators as of late (Tuesday, November 11), caution he would use “the hammer, now not the gavel,” to put into effect self-discipline in long run court cases.

Addressing the House, the Speaker instantly sought to fix members of the family between the Legislature and the Judiciary, two coequal palms of presidency established below the 1992 Constitution.

Mr. Bagbin wired that the integrity of the constitutional framework relies at the mutual admire between the organs of state, an idea rooted within the doctrine of separation of powers.

“I wish to reaffirm Parliament’s unwavering respect for the Judiciary as a coequal arm of governance under Article 125(1) of the 1992 Constitution,” he stated.

He emphasised that the Judiciary will have to stay unbiased and “will have to now not be subjected to regulate or finance from anyone or authority,” not directly referencing the desire for restraint right through the political scrutiny inherent within the vetting procedure.

The apology used to be framed across the violation of Parliament’s personal procedural laws, the Standing Orders, which govern the habits of MPs right through debates and committee sittings.

“Parliamentary rules caution members against imputing improper motives or using words that are disrespectful or likely to cause offence. The Standing Orders serve as a reminder that our proceedings must always reflect the dignity and integrity of Parliament as a key organ of state,” he mentioned.

The Speaker showed that the vetting incident concerned decorum breaches and instantly took administrative steps to forestall recurrence.

To be certain responsibility, Mr. Bagbin disclosed that he has officially directed the business owner of the Appointments Committee—the frame chargeable for engaging in the vetting—to take decisive notice of the misconduct.

The directive mandates that: “in all long run court cases, the perfect requirements of civility, objectivity, and institutional admire are maintained.”

Concluding his remarks with a definitive caution, the Speaker promised stricter enforcement of procedural decorum one day:

“I will come back on this issue of decency, discipline, and decorum—and this time, I am coming with the hammer, not the gavel,” he declared.

The incident comes at a delicate time for the rustic, because the Legislature is predicted to take care of steadiness and cooperation with the Judiciary, specifically right through high-profile political processes. The Speaker affirmed that Parliament “cherishes its longstanding cooperation and mutual regard with the Judiciary” and stays dedicated to strengthening that crucial dating.

DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made through Readers and Contributors in this platform don’t essentially constitute the perspectives or coverage of Multimedia Group Limited.

DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made through Readers and Contributors in this platform don’t essentially constitute the perspectives or coverage of Multimedia Group Limited.