Why Ghana Must Prioritize Competence Over Loudness in Parliamentary Candidate Selection

Published: November 23, 2025 | Life Pulse Daily Update

Introduction

In Ghana’s evolving political landscape, the debate on competence over loudness in politics has gained urgency. For years, parliamentary candidate selection has often favored charismatic showmanship, family names, and social media buzz over proven skills and intellectual depth. This article examines how prioritizing parliamentary candidate competence can transform governance, drawing from observable trends in Ghanaian elections. Keywords like skills over popularity in elections and Ghana political reform highlight the need for a shift toward substance-driven leadership.

The Cost of Misplaced Priorities

Historical election outcomes show constituencies suffering from ineffective representation when noise trumps expertise. Ghana needs leaders who excel in legislative scrutiny, not just rally crowds.

Analysis

This section dissects the pitfalls of equating popularity with political competence Ghana. Political parties have long relied on reputation as a proxy for ability, but data from past parliaments reveals a disconnect. For instance, reports from the Ghana Center for Democratic Development (CDD-Ghana) indicate that many MPs prioritize visibility over policy impact.

Popularity vs. True Competence

Popularity stems from flamboyance, but competence in parliamentary roles demands intellectual discipline, policy analysis, and negotiation skills. Verifiable examples include MPs who shine in primaries through theatrics but falter in committees like Finance or Constitutional, Legal, and Parliamentary Affairs.

Impact on Constituencies and National Policy

Constituencies gain little from loud representatives when budgets remain mismanaged or reforms stall. National agendas suffer as eloquent, expert voices are sidelined, perpetuating mediocrity in legislation.

Historical Patterns in Ghanaian Politics

Since the Fourth Republic’s inception in 1992, primaries have amplified “godfather protégés” and self-promoters. Election Commission data shows repeat candidates often winning on name recognition, not track records.

Summary

To summarize, Ghana’s politics must end the era of raising loudness over competence. Parties should adopt criteria emphasizing integrity in political candidates, subject-matter expertise, and calm eloquence. This pivot ensures parliament functions as a rigorous legislative body, not a popularity arena, fostering progress beyond mediocrity.

Key Points

Practical Advice

Political parties and voters can implement changes for selecting competent parliamentary candidates. Here’s actionable guidance rooted in best practices from democratic systems.

For Political Parties

Revise vetting processes: Mandate CVs with verifiable achievements, policy papers, and interviews assessing legislative knowledge. Use scorecards weighting competence at 60%, popularity at 10%.

For Voters and Constituencies

Research candidates’ records via platforms like the Parliamentary Service website. Attend forums questioning expertise, not charisma. Support primaries with competence audits.

Training and Mentorship Programs

Parties should invest in leadership academies, similar to the National Democratic Congress (NDC) or New Patriotic Party (NPP) policy institutes, focusing on legislative skills.

Points of Caution

While shifting to competence over popularity Ghana, beware these risks:

• Elite Capture: Overemphasizing credentials might exclude grassroots talent; balance with inclusivity quotas.
• Manipulation of Metrics: Fake qualifications proliferate; verify via independent bodies like the Electoral Commission.
• Short-Term Backlash: Quiet experts may lose initial primaries; educate voters on long-term gains.
• Party Resistance: Incumbents benefiting from status quo may sabotage reforms.

Monitoring Progress

Track via annual reports from think tanks like IMANI Africa, ensuring competence yields tangible constituency improvements.

Comparison

Comparing Ghana to peers illustrates the benefits of prioritizing skills in politics.

Ghana vs. Singapore: Meritocracy Model

Singapore’s People’s Action Party uses rigorous exams and performance reviews for candidates, yielding world-class governance. Ghana could adapt similar filters for parliamentary aspirants.

Ghana vs. South Africa: Post-Apartheid Reforms

South Africa’s ANC implemented cadre deployment with competence tests post-1994, reducing cadreism. Ghana’s parties might emulate via constitutional vetting committees.

Ghana vs. Kenya: Regional Insights

Kenya’s 2010 Constitution mandates integrity checks for MPs, curbing flamboyance. Ghana’s 1992 Constitution (Article 97) already requires good behavior, ripe for enforcement.

Legal Implications

Ghana’s legal framework supports competence-focused selection without mandating it explicitly. Article 97 of the 1992 Constitution qualifies MPs as persons of good behavior, sound judgment, and integrity—verifiable via court rulings like MPs challenging eligibility in Electoral Commission disputes.

Electoral Laws and Primaries

CI 94 (Public Elections Regulations) governs primaries but leaves criteria to parties. No legal bar to competence mandates, but challenges could arise under freedom of association (Article 21). Precedents from Supreme Court cases affirm party autonomy while upholding public interest.

Enforceability

Parties risk litigation if selections appear corrupt; competence criteria mitigate this by providing defensible standards.

Conclusion

Ghana stands at a crossroads: continue elevating loudness or embrace competence in Ghanaian politics for enduring progress. By prioritizing expert, integrity-driven candidates, parties can deliver disciplined legislation, economic reforms, and constituency upliftment. The time for substance over noise is now—let this guide future primaries and elections.

FAQ