Tanyigbe royal homes problem the legitimacy of Togbega Kodi Adiko VI – Life Pulse Daily

Introduction

The Tanyigbe royal homes dispute has captured national attention in Ghana, centering on the legitimacy of Togbega Kodi Adiko VI as the Paramount Chief of the Tanyigbe Traditional Area. This controversy involves a challenge from members of the Akoto Royal House and allied families against claims made in a press release dated December 23, 2025. The dispute raises critical questions about traditional governance procedures, legal processes, and the role of statutory bodies in resolving chieftaincy conflicts.

This article provides a comprehensive analysis of the dispute, examining the key claims, legal implications, and the broader context of traditional leadership in Ghana. We aim to offer clear, accurate, and verifiable information to help readers understand the complexities of this issue.

Key Points

Background

Traditional Leadership in Ghana

Traditional leadership in Ghana plays a significant role in local governance, cultural preservation, and community development. Chiefs and traditional councils are recognized under the 1992 Constitution and operate within a framework established by the Chieftaincy Act of 2008 (Act 759). The National House of Chiefs and Regional Houses of Chiefs serve as statutory bodies responsible for the regulation and adjudication of chieftaincy matters.

The Tanyigbe Traditional Area

The Tanyigbe Traditional Area is located in the Volta Region of Ghana. Like many traditional areas, it has a complex history of royal lineages and governance structures. The area’s traditional council is expected to function in accordance with established procedures, including the official presentation of council members to the appropriate House of Chiefs for swearing-in and gazetting by the state.

Previous Leadership Issues

The dispute over Togbega Kodi Adiko VI’s legitimacy is not isolated. Previous statements by Katamanto Togbe Etoi Kodzo II have indicated that the Tanyigbe Traditional Council has not been actively functioning since its inauguration. This context is crucial for understanding the current challenge to the council’s authority and the legitimacy of its actions.

Analysis

The Challenge to the Press Release

The rejoinder dated January 8, 2026, signed by Robert Apaka on behalf of the Etoi Kodzo family and Emmanuel Kagbe for the Kagbe family, directly challenges the authenticity of the press release attributed to the Tanyigbe Traditional Council. The families argue that the council is not properly constituted and therefore lacks the authority to issue such statements.

Procedural Requirements for Traditional Councils

According to the disputing families, a Traditional Council only becomes fully operational after the Paramount Chief officially presents its members to the appropriate House of Chiefs for swearing-in, followed by gazetting by the state. In the absence of sworn-in members, no Registrar has been appointed by the state, meaning the official business of the council cannot lawfully commence.

Legal Proceedings

The matter is currently before the courts, with an appeal hearing held on December 9, 2025, at the National House of Chiefs in Kumasi. This legal process underscores the seriousness of the dispute and the need for a definitive resolution through established legal channels.

Call for Verification

The families have called for verification of the claims with the Volta Regional House of Chiefs to ascertain whether the Paramount Chief referenced in the press release is officially recognized by the statutory body. This step is crucial for ensuring that any claims of legitimacy are based on official recognition rather than self-proclamation.

Practical Advice

For Stakeholders in Chieftaincy Disputes

• Ensure all claims are supported by official documentation from recognized statutory bodies.
• Follow established legal procedures for resolving disputes, including appeals to the appropriate Houses of Chiefs.
• Maintain transparency and avoid making unverified statements that could escalate tensions.
• Engage in dialogue and mediation where possible to seek amicable resolutions.

For the General Public

• Verify information from multiple reliable sources before forming opinions.
• Respect the legal process and avoid taking sides based on incomplete information.
• Support efforts to resolve disputes through established legal and traditional channels.
• Stay informed about developments through official statements and reputable news sources.

FAQ

Conclusion

The Tanyigbe royal homes dispute over the legitimacy of Togbega Kodi Adiko VI highlights the complexities of traditional leadership in Ghana. The challenge from the Akoto Royal House and allied families underscores the importance of following established procedures and legal processes in resolving chieftaincy matters.

As the dispute continues to unfold, it is essential for all parties to adhere to the rule of law and engage in transparent, respectful dialogue. The role of statutory bodies such as the National House of Chiefs and the Volta Regional House of Chiefs is crucial in ensuring that any resolution is based on official recognition and legal authority.

For the general public, staying informed through reliable sources and respecting the legal process is key to understanding and supporting a fair and just resolution to this dispute.