Tanzania Election 2025: President Samia Suluhu Hassan Blamed for Post-Election Violence and Shattered Peace Image

Introduction

Tanzania, long celebrated as a pillar of stability and peace in East Africa, faces unprecedented post-election violence following the 2025 presidential election. President Samia Suluhu Hassan secured a landslide victory with 98% of the vote, but the results sparked deadly protests, drawing sharp criticism from regional bodies like the African Union (AU) and Southern African Development Community (SADC). This turmoil has eroded Tanzania’s historical “charisma of balance,” a term referring to its reputation for calm consensus amid neighboring conflicts.

Youth-led demonstrations, echoing Kenya’s Gen Z protests, highlight bottled-up grievances over stalled reforms and opposition suppression. Analysts blame President Samia—initially praised for her mild demeanor after succeeding John Magufuli in 2021—for overseeing a repressive crackdown. This article breaks down the Tanzania election violence 2025, its roots, and implications, providing clear insights for understanding East African political unrest.

Analysis

Historical Context of Tanzania’s Stability

Tanzania’s image as Africa’s beacon of peace stems from its post-independence era under founding President Julius Nyerere. The ruling Chama Cha Mapinduzi (CCM) party, evolved from the Tanganyika African National Union liberation movement, has dominated since 1977, maintaining power through a mix of consensus and control. Unlike volatile neighbors like Kenya or Uganda, Tanzania avoided major protests for decades, fostering a national psyche of order.

John Magufuli’s 2015-2021 presidency shifted this toward authoritarianism, with crackdowns on opposition and media. Samia Suluhu Hassan’s ascension in March 2021 brought hope via her “4R” framework—reconciliation, resilience, rebuilding, and reform—allowing opposition rallies and easing restrictions.

Build-Up to the 2025 Election Violence

Pre-election months saw systematic barriers to opposition participation. Key figures like Tundu Lissu of Chadema faced treason charges and detention, while Luhaga Mpina’s candidacy was rejected on technicalities. Abductions, arrests, and killings of opposition members intensified, alongside internet blackouts and curfews, contracting the political space.

Analysts note internal CCM power struggles. President Samia reshuffled cabinets, military, and intelligence leadership multiple times, sidelining Magufuli loyalists. This “Simba jike” (lioness) strategy secured her CCM nomination in January 2025 but alienated reformers.

Expert Perspectives on the Shift

Kenyan policy analyst Prof. Peter Kagwanja told the BBC that President Samia drove Tanzania into “its thick winter of protests, instability, and uncertainty,” negating Nyerere’s legacy of engaging rather than jailing opponents. Tanzanian cartoonist Godfrey Mwampembwa (Gado) described protests as the “result of years of anger bottled up,” accusing CCM of disenfranchising masses and ignoring institutions.

Veteran journalist Jenerali Ulimwengu called the election a “boiling point” of long-simmering societal issues ignored by an “absent-minded rulership.” East African commentator Charles Onyango-Obbo argued CCM mistook exhaustion-induced silence for maturity, with its “wonderful history” masking arrogance.

Summary

In summary, Tanzania’s 2025 election resulted in President Samia Suluhu Hassan’s re-election amid disputed polls marred by opposition bans, violence, and protests. The death toll remains unconfirmed—opposition claims hundreds—shattering the nation’s protest-shy image. AU and SADC rebuked the process for ballot-stuffing and repression, while President Samia blamed foreign actors in her inauguration speech, acknowledging protest deaths but defending the vote’s fairness.

Key Points

Practical Advice

For Tanzanian Citizens and Youth Activists

Stay informed via verified sources amid internet disruptions. Document incidents safely using international hotlines like Amnesty International. Engage in peaceful advocacy, learning from Nyerere’s consensus model to push for electoral reforms.

For Travelers and Expats in Tanzania

Monitor travel advisories from your government’s foreign office, avoiding protest areas in Dar es Salaam and Zanzibar. Register with embassy services for emergencies. Use VPNs for reliable news during blackouts.

For Investors and Businesses

Assess risks to operations; Tanzania’s stability was a draw for tourism and mining. Diversify amid uncertainty, consulting East African Community reports on political stability.

Points of Caution

Death toll figures vary: Government has not released official numbers, while Chadema claims hundreds died in unrest. Verify claims independently, as social media amplifies unconfirmed reports like Gado’s widely shared cartoons depicting authoritarianism.

Political cartoons and columns, while insightful, represent opinions. Official narratives from CCM contrast opposition views. Exercise caution interpreting election integrity without independent audits, as AU/SADC critiques highlight systemic flaws but stop short of nullifying results.

Avoid speculation on foreign involvement, as President Samia’s claims lack public evidence. Focus on verifiable events like opposition detentions.

Comparison

Tanzania vs. Kenya’s Gen Z Protests

Tanzania’s youth protests mirror Kenya’s 2024 Gen Z mobilizations against tax hikes and governance failures, both leveraging social media for rapid organization. However, Kenya’s allowed greater opposition space, leading to policy concessions, whereas Tanzania’s preemptive crackdowns escalated violence.

Versus Other African Elections

Unlike Zimbabwe’s 2023 polls with similar repression but less regional outcry, Tanzania faced AU/SADC condemnation. Compared to Uganda’s 2021 election, where Bobi Wine was blocked similarly, Tanzania’s prior reform promises under Samia heightened betrayal perceptions, ending its “exceptionalism.”

Legal Implications

Tundu Lissu’s treason charges carry severe penalties under Tanzanian law, potentially life imprisonment if convicted; he denies them. Luhaga Mpina’s rejection on technical grounds raises questions of electoral law compliance, as per the National Electoral Commission rules.

AU and SADC statements invoke African Charter on Democracy, Elections and Governance, pressuring Tanzania for compliance. Chadema’s dismissal of results as “fabricated” could spur legal challenges, though courts’ independence is contested. No international sanctions yet, but scrutiny may affect aid and trade.

Conclusion

Tanzania’s post-election violence 2025 marks a pivotal shift, with President Samia Suluhu Hassan facing blame for prioritizing power over promised reforms. Once a model of balance, the nation now grapples with instability, youth anger, and legitimacy questions. As her second term begins, multinational pressure mounts, underscoring the need for genuine reconciliation to restore trust. This crisis teaches broader lessons on the fragility of long-term dominance without responsiveness in African democracies.

FAQ