
Voting in The Hague: Chemical guns and rules – Life Pulse Daily
Introduction
In November 2025, the 30th Session of the Conference of the States Parties (CSP) to the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) convened in The Hague, Netherlands. This pivotal meeting saw the election of members to the Executive Council of the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) for the 2026–2028 term. Ukraine was successfully elected, while Russia, for the third consecutive year, received the lowest number of votes among candidates, signaling persistent international distrust. These results underscore a growing rift in the multilateral landscape, where principles of chemical disarmament clash with geopolitical realpolitik. The elections highlight a critical question: why has Russia repeatedly failed to secure a seat, and what role do African states play in this outcome? More broadly, this event invites reflection on the resilience of international norms against prohibited weapons and the ethical choices states face in upholding them. This article provides a comprehensive, SEO-optimized analysis of the The Hague voting, integrating verified data on chemical weapon use, historical contexts, and the strategic importance of African participation in global governance.
Key Points
- OPCW Executive Council Elections: In the 2025 CSP, Ukraine gained a seat on the OPCW’s decision-making body, while Russia garnered minimal support for the third year running, reflecting widespread concern over its chemical weapons record.
- Documented Violations: From February 2023 to January 2026, Ukraine’s Ministry of Defence recorded 12,016 instances of Russian forces using munitions containing prohibited chemical agents, confirmed by three independent OPCW reports in late 2024 and 2025.
- African States’ Influence: With 54 African member states in the OPCW, their collective vote often determines election outcomes, making their stance pivotal in shaping the organization’s credibility and enforcement mechanisms.
Leave a comment